Claesson L, Gosman-Hedström G, Johannesson M, Fagerberg B, Blomstrand C
Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological Disease Section, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, G¿teborg, Sweden.
Stroke. 2000 Nov;31(11):2569-77. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.11.2569.
The aim of the present study was to examine resource utilization during a 12-month period after acute stroke in elderly patients randomized to care in an acute stroke unit integrated with a care continuum compared with conventional care in general medical wards. A secondary aim was to describe costs related to the severity of stroke.
Two hundred forty-nine consecutive patients aged >/=70 years with acute stroke within 7 days before admission, living in their own homes in Göteborg, Sweden, without recognized need of care were randomized to 2 groups: 166 patients were assigned to nonintensive stroke unit care with a care continuum, and 83 patients were assigned to conventional care. There was no difference in mortality or the proportion of patients living at home after 1 year. Main outcomes were costs from inpatient care, outpatient care, and informal care.
Mean annual cost per patient was 170, 000 Swedish crowns (SEK) (equivalent to $25,373) and 191,000 SEK ($28,507) in the stroke unit and the general medical ward groups, respectively (P:=NS). Seventy percent of the total cost was for inpatient care, and 30% was for outpatient and informal care. For patients with mild, moderate, and severe stroke, the mean annual costs per patient were 107,000 SEK ($15,970), 263,000 SEK ($39, 254), and 220,000 SEK ($32,836), respectively (P:<0.001). There was no statistical difference in age or nonstroke diagnosis.
The total costs the first year did not differ significantly between the treatment groups in this prospective study. The total annual cost per patient showed a very large variation, which was related to stroke severity at onset and not to age or nonstroke diagnoses. Costs other than those for hospital care constituted a substantial fraction of total costs and must be taken into account when organizing the management of stroke patients. The high variability in costs necessitates a larger study to assess long-term cost effectiveness.
本研究旨在比较老年急性卒中患者在随机分配至与连续护理相结合的急性卒中单元接受护理和在普通内科病房接受传统护理后12个月期间的资源利用情况。次要目的是描述与卒中严重程度相关的费用。
连续纳入249例年龄≥70岁、入院前7天内发生急性卒中、居住在瑞典哥德堡自己家中且无公认护理需求的患者,随机分为两组:166例患者被分配至接受连续护理的非强化卒中单元护理组,83例患者被分配至传统护理组。1年后两组患者的死亡率或在家居住患者比例无差异。主要结局指标为住院护理、门诊护理和非正式护理的费用。
卒中单元组和普通内科病房组患者的年均费用分别为170,000瑞典克朗(SEK)(相当于25,373美元)和191,000 SEK(28,507美元)(P=无显著差异)。总费用的70%用于住院护理,30%用于门诊和非正式护理。轻度、中度和重度卒中患者的年均费用分别为107,000 SEK(15,970美元)、263,000 SEK(39,254美元)和220,000 SEK(32,836美元)(P<0.001)。两组患者在年龄或非卒中诊断方面无统计学差异。
在这项前瞻性研究中,治疗组第一年的总费用无显著差异。每位患者的年均总费用差异很大,这与发病时的卒中严重程度有关,而与年龄或非卒中诊断无关。除医院护理费用外的其他费用占总费用的很大一部分,在组织卒中患者管理时必须予以考虑。费用的高度变异性需要进行更大规模的研究来评估长期成本效益。