Brodsky M H, Schiemann D A
Appl Microbiol. 1975 Nov;30(5):727-30. doi: 10.1128/am.30.5.727-730.1975.
Four brands of membrane filters were examined for total and fecal coliform recovery performance by two experimental approaches. Using diluted EC broth cultures of water samples, Johns-Manville filters were superior to Sartorius filters for fecal coliform but equivalent for total coliform recovery. Using river water samples, Johns-Manville filters were superior to Sartorius filters for total coliform but equivalent for fecal coliform recovery. No differences were observed between Johns-Manville and Millipore or Millipore and Sartorius filters for total or fecal coliform recoveries using either approach, nor was any difference observed between Millipore and Gelman filters for fecal coliform recovery from river water samples. These results indicate that the source of the coliform bacteria has an important influence on the conclusions of membrane filter evaluation studies.
通过两种实验方法,对四种品牌的膜过滤器进行了总大肠菌群和粪大肠菌群回收性能检测。使用水样的稀释EC肉汤培养物时,约翰斯-曼维尔过滤器在粪大肠菌群回收方面优于赛多利斯过滤器,但在总大肠菌群回收方面相当。使用河水样本时,约翰斯-曼维尔过滤器在总大肠菌群回收方面优于赛多利斯过滤器,但在粪大肠菌群回收方面相当。使用任何一种方法时,在总大肠菌群或粪大肠菌群回收方面,约翰斯-曼维尔过滤器与密理博过滤器之间、密理博过滤器与赛多利斯过滤器之间均未观察到差异,从河水样本中回收粪大肠菌群时,密理博过滤器与吉尔曼过滤器之间也未观察到差异。这些结果表明,大肠菌群细菌的来源对膜过滤器评估研究的结论有重要影响。