Arnoldus J H, Killestein J, Pfennings L E, Jelles B, Uitdehaag B M, Polman C H
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mult Scler. 2000 Oct;6(5):338-42. doi: 10.1177/135245850000600508.
To determine the quality of life (QoL) of MS patients during the initial 6 months of treatment with interferon-beta (IFN-beta). Furthermore, to determine whether changes in QoL relate to disability, emotional state, therapeutic expectations or side effect profile.
IFN-beta has been shown to have beneficial effects on the course of MS. Since the aim of IFN-beta treatment is not to cure but to slow down the disease it is important to know how this treatment affects QoL. Surprisingly, the impact of treatment with IFN-beta on QoL measures has not been extensively studied so far.
Case report documentation, including EDSS, SF-36 and MADRAS scores, of 51 relapsing-remitting MS patients treated with IFN-beta was obtained at baseline and at months 1, 3 and 6. Patients also filled in a form about their expectations of therapy and a questionnaire on side effects.
During treatment there was a significant linear trend indicating improvement in the role-physical functioning (RPF) scale of the SF-36 (F(1,50)=4.9, P=0.032). A transient decrease at month 1 was found in the scale for bodily pain, indicating more experienced pain (F(1,50)=19.8, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with most depressive symptoms on the MADRAS at baseline contributed most to the increase in RPF scores over time (F(1,24)=5,6 P=0.026). Furthermore, we found associations between adverse event scores and several domains of QoL.
Our findings suggest that IFN-beta therapy has an impact on QoL of MS patients in that it improves role-physical functioning and transiently worsens experienced bodily pain. QoL during treatment with IFN-beta is influenced by depressive symptoms at baseline as well as by treatment-associated side-effects. Multiple Sclerosis (2000) 6 338 - 342
确定使用β-干扰素(IFN-β)治疗的最初6个月内多发性硬化症(MS)患者的生活质量(QoL)。此外,确定生活质量的变化是否与残疾、情绪状态、治疗期望或副作用情况相关。
已证明IFN-β对MS病程有有益影响。由于IFN-β治疗的目的不是治愈而是减缓疾病进展,了解这种治疗如何影响生活质量很重要。令人惊讶的是,迄今为止,IFN-β治疗对生活质量指标的影响尚未得到广泛研究。
获取了51例接受IFN-β治疗的复发缓解型MS患者在基线时以及第1、3和6个月时的病例报告文件,包括扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)、健康调查简表36(SF-36)和多发性硬化症抑郁量表(MADRAS)评分。患者还填写了一份关于其治疗期望的表格和一份关于副作用的问卷。
治疗期间有显著的线性趋势,表明SF-36的身体功能角色(RPF)量表有所改善(F(1,50)=4.9,P=0.032)。在第1个月时发现身体疼痛量表有短暂下降,表明疼痛感受增加(F(1,50)=19.8,P<0.001)。亚组分析表明,基线时MADRAS上抑郁症状最严重(F(1,24)=5.6,P=0.026)的患者对RPF评分随时间的增加贡献最大。此外,我们发现不良事件评分与生活质量的几个领域之间存在关联。
我们的研究结果表明,IFN-β治疗对MS患者的生活质量有影响,因为它改善了身体功能角色,同时使身体疼痛感受暂时恶化。IFN-β治疗期间的生活质量受基线时的抑郁症状以及与治疗相关的副作用影响。《多发性硬化症》(2000年)6卷 338 - 342页