• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

演员、搭档及观察者对讽刺的认知。

Actors', partners', and observers' perceptions of sarcasm.

作者信息

Rockwell P

机构信息

Department of Communication, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, 70504, USA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Oct;91(2):665-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.91.2.665.

DOI:10.2466/pms.2000.91.2.665
PMID:11065329
Abstract

This study compared actors', partners', and observers' perceptions of the amount of sarcasm used by participants (n = 80) in videotaped conversations. Significant differences were found among perceptions of actors, partners, and observers. Of the three perspectives, actors perceived themselves as using the greatest amount of sarcasm, followed by partners' perceptions of actors. Observers perceived actors as using the least amount of sarcasm. Correlations conducted to assess whether partners and observers recognized actors' individual attempts at sarcasm during the conversations were generally low.

摘要

本研究比较了演员、搭档和观察者对80名参与者在录像对话中使用讽刺话语数量的看法。研究发现,演员、搭档和观察者的看法存在显著差异。在这三种视角中,演员认为自己使用的讽刺话语最多,其次是搭档对演员的看法。观察者则认为演员使用的讽刺话语最少。为评估搭档和观察者在对话过程中是否能识别演员的个人讽刺尝试而进行的相关性分析结果普遍较低。

相似文献

1
Actors', partners', and observers' perceptions of sarcasm.演员、搭档及观察者对讽刺的认知。
Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Oct;91(2):665-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.91.2.665.
2
Partners' Withdrawal When Actors Behave Destructively: Implications for Perceptions of Partners' Responsiveness and Relationship Satisfaction.当行为具有破坏性的演员的合作伙伴退出:对合作伙伴反应性和关系满意度的看法的启示。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Feb;47(2):307-323. doi: 10.1177/0146167220926820. Epub 2020 May 29.
3
Acting, behaving, and the selfless basis of metaperception.行为、举止以及元感知的无私基础。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):910-21. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.910.
4
Feeling loved as a strong link in relationship interactions: Partners who feel loved may buffer destructive behavior by actors who feel unloved.在关系互动中感受到被爱是一种强大的纽带:感受到被爱的伴侣可能会缓冲那些感觉不被爱的人所表现出的破坏性行为。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Aug;125(2):367-396. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000419. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
5
Empathy and the expression and recognition of sarcasm by close relations or strangers.亲密关系者或陌生人之间的同理心以及讽刺的表达与识别。
Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Aug;97(1):251-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.1.251.
6
The burden of responsibility: Interpersonal costs of high self-control.责任的重担:高自控力的人际代价。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 May;108(5):750-66. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000015.
7
Comparing the interpersonal behavior of distressed couples with and without depression.比较有抑郁和无抑郁的困扰夫妻的人际行为。
J Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec;69(12):1250-68. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21998. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
8
A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners' Security Buffer the Effects of Actors' Insecurity on Daily Commitment?双重视角下的安全感:伴侣的安全感是否能缓冲主体不安全感对日常承诺的影响?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 12;17(20):7411. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207411.
9
Discrepancies between patients' and partners' perceptions of unsupportive behavior in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.患者和伴侣对慢性阻塞性肺疾病中不支持行为的看法存在差异。
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Jun;26(3):464-9. doi: 10.1037/a0028333. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
10
Supporting close others' growth after trauma: The role of responsiveness in romantic partners' mutual posttraumatic growth.支持创伤后亲密他人的成长:回应能力在浪漫伴侣相互创伤后成长中的作用。
Psychol Trauma. 2016 May;8(3):334-342. doi: 10.1037/tra0000084. Epub 2015 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The 5% difference: early sensory processing predicts sarcasm perception in schizophrenia and schizo-affective disorder.5%的差异:早期感觉加工预测精神分裂症和分裂情感障碍患者的讽刺理解能力。
Psychol Med. 2014 Jan;44(1):25-36. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713000834. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
2
Vocal features of conversational sarcasm: a comparison of methods.会话讽刺的语音特征:方法比较
J Psycholinguist Res. 2007 Sep;36(5):361-9. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9049-0.