Moon M
Baxter Health Policy Rev. 1996;2:317-49.
Interest in Medicare, the government's second largest social program after Social Security, reached a new high in 1995, not as part of health care reform, but as a vehicle for deficit reduction and because of a desire by Congress to restructure the program to encourage enhanced choice for beneficiaries and greater use of managed care. Medicaid, a major payer of long-term care and financer of coverage for low-income elderly, also is slated to undergo major restructuring in the next few years. As Congress and the nation debate the future of these key programs for older Americans, a number of critical issues deserve attention. Medicare's costs are very high--but not necessarily unreasonable in the face of the demands on health care services for this part of the population. And even with these high costs, a number of important gaps in coverage remain a problem for seniors. Deductibles and copayments are also high--especially for hospital and skilled nursing services. But pressure for change may well lead to higher, not lower, cost-sharing requirements. Medicare remains a largely fee-for-service program at a time when the national health care system is shifting increasingly to a managed care environment. Moving Medicare in that direction is one likely option for change. While it is desirable to have Medicare move in concert with the rest of the system, a number of issues stand in the way of an effortless move to managed care for the elderly. Moreover, coordination of long-term and acute care services may be even more challenging in such an environment. Medicaid covers long-term care services for older Americans, but only for those who have depleted most of their assets and income. Even when people do become eligible, Medicaid covers primarily institutional care. But little is likely to change this picture in the next few years, and private efforts through expansion of long-term care insurance will likely provide only a partial solution.
医疗保险是政府继社会保障之后的第二大社会项目,1995年对它的关注达到了一个新高度,这并非作为医疗保健改革的一部分,而是作为削减赤字的手段,同时也是因为国会希望对该项目进行重组,以鼓励受益人有更多选择并更多地使用管理式医疗。医疗补助计划是长期护理的主要支付者和低收入老年人保险的资助者,未来几年也计划进行重大重组。在国会和全国就这些针对美国老年人的关键项目的未来展开辩论之际,一些关键问题值得关注。医疗保险的成本非常高——但鉴于这部分人群对医疗服务的需求,这不一定不合理。即便成本高昂,保险覆盖范围的一些重要缺口对老年人来说仍是个问题。免赔额和共付额也很高——尤其是住院和专业护理服务方面。但变革的压力很可能导致更高而非更低的费用分摊要求。在国家医疗保健系统日益转向管理式医疗环境之际,医疗保险基本上仍是一个按服务收费的项目。朝着那个方向推动医疗保险是一种可能的变革选择。虽然希望医疗保险能与系统的其他部分同步发展,但存在一些问题阻碍着老年人轻松转向管理式医疗。此外,在这样的环境下,长期护理和急症护理服务的协调可能更具挑战性。医疗补助计划为美国老年人提供长期护理服务,但只针对那些资产和收入大部分已耗尽的人。即使人们符合条件,医疗补助计划主要覆盖机构护理。但在未来几年,这种情况不太可能有太大改变,通过扩大长期护理保险的私人努力可能只能提供部分解决方案。