Suppr超能文献

预先指示:法律补救措施与心理社会干预

Advance directives: legal remedies and psychosocial interventions.

作者信息

Lens V, Pollack D

机构信息

Wurzweiler School of Social Work, Yeshiva University, New York, USA.

出版信息

Death Stud. 2000 Jul-Aug;24(5):377-99. doi: 10.1080/07481180050045647.

Abstract

Although the legal basis to refuse life supports is firmly embedded in the laws of all 50 states, there is evidence that a gap exists between patients' preferences and physicians' actions. Patients and their families have increasingly begun to turn to the courts for redress, requesting damages when a physician has ignored their request to forgo life-sustaining treatment. This article explores the reasons why patients' end-of-life medical choices are often ignored by the medical profession and the results of recent attempts to remedy these situations through the courts. Implications for practice are discussed, including practical suggestions for increasing the likelihood that a patient's wishes will be respected by medical providers.

摘要

尽管拒绝生命维持治疗的法律依据在所有50个州的法律中都有坚实的基础,但有证据表明患者的偏好与医生的行为之间存在差距。患者及其家属越来越多地开始向法院寻求救济,当医生无视他们放弃维持生命治疗的请求时,要求获得损害赔偿。本文探讨了医疗行业常常忽视患者临终医疗选择的原因,以及最近试图通过法院补救这些情况的结果。文中还讨论了对实践的启示,包括提高医疗服务提供者尊重患者意愿可能性的实用建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验