Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
BMC Med Ethics. 2012 Nov 21;13:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-31.
Following passage of the Patient Self Determination Act in 1990, health care institutions that receive Medicare and Medicaid funding are required to inform patients of their right to make their health care preferences known through execution of a living will and/or to appoint a surrogate-decision maker. We evaluated the impact of external factors and perceived patient preferences on physicians' decisions to honor or forgo previously established advance directives (ADs). In addition, physician views regarding legal risk, patients' ability to comprehend complexities involved with their care, and impact of medical costs related to end-of-life care decisions were explored.
Attendees of two Mayo Clinic continuing medical education courses were surveyed. Three scenarios based in part on previously court-litigated matters assessed impact of external factors and perceived patient preferences on physician compliance with patient-articulated wishes regarding resuscitation. General questions measured respondents' perception of legal risk, concerns over patient knowledge of idiosyncrasies involved with their care, and impact medical costs may have on compliance with patient preferences. Responses indicating strength of agreement or disagreement with statements were treated as ordinal data and analyzed using the Cochran Armitage trend test.
Three hundred eighty-eight of 951 surveys were completed (41% response rate). Eighty percent reported they were likely to honor a patient's AD despite its 5 year age. Fewer than half (41%) would honor the AD of a patient in ventricular fibrillation who had expressed a desire to "pass away in peace." Few (17%) would forgo an AD following a family's request for continued resuscitative treatment. A majority (52%) considered risk of liability to be lower when maintaining someone alive against their wishes than mistakenly failing to provide resuscitative efforts. A large percentage (74%) disagreed that patients could not appreciate complexities surrounding their care while 69% agreed that costs should never impact a physician's decision as to whether to comply with a patient's AD.
Our findings highlight the impact, albeit small, external factors have on physician AD compliance. Most respondents based their decision on the clinical situation at hand and interpretation of the patient's initial wishes and preferences expressed by the AD.
1990 年《病人自决法案》通过后,接受医疗保险和医疗补助资金的医疗机构被要求告知患者,他们有权通过执行生前遗嘱和/或指定代理人来表达自己的医疗偏好。我们评估了外部因素和患者感知偏好对医生是否遵守事先制定的预立医嘱(AD)的影响。此外,还探讨了医生对法律风险的看法、患者理解与自身护理相关复杂性的能力,以及与临终关怀决策相关的医疗费用的影响。
调查了 Mayo 诊所两次继续医学教育课程的与会者。三个基于部分先前法庭诉讼案例的场景评估了外部因素和患者感知偏好对医生是否遵守患者对复苏意愿的影响。一般问题衡量了受访者对法律风险的看法、对患者了解自身护理特殊性的担忧,以及医疗费用对遵守患者偏好的影响。对表示同意或不同意的回答进行了有序数据处理,并使用 Cochran-Armitage 趋势检验进行了分析。
在 951 份调查中,有 388 份(41%的回复率)完成了调查。80%的人表示,即使 AD 已经有 5 年的历史,他们也很可能会遵守患者的 AD。不到一半(41%)的人会尊重处于心室颤动且表达“平静离世”愿望的患者的 AD。在接到家属要求继续复苏治疗的请求后,很少(17%)人会放弃 AD。大多数(52%)人认为,违背患者意愿维持其生命的法律责任风险低于错误地不提供复苏治疗的风险。很大一部分(74%)人不同意患者无法理解自身护理的复杂性,而 69%的人同意费用不应影响医生是否遵守患者 AD 的决定。
我们的研究结果突出了外部因素对医生 AD 遵守情况的影响,尽管影响很小。大多数受访者根据当前的临床情况以及对 AD 中患者最初意愿和偏好的解释来做出决定。