Féry F
Service d'Endocrinologie, Hôpital Erasme, U.L.B.
Rev Med Brux. 2000 Sep;21(4):A347-52.
Although diet has always been recognized as the cornerstone in the management of diabetes, dietary recommendations are evolving continuously. There is now some consensus that the goals of medical nutrition therapy should be to attain and/or maintain a reasonable body weight, to ensure the best possible glycemic control and to reduce cardiovascular risk factors but the means to achieve these goals are still under discussion. Apart from caloric restriction which is, without any doubt, highly efficient but hardly applied in obese diabetic patients, the clinical benefits of the traditional measures to alleviate postprandial hyperglycemia (increasing meal frequency, consumption of carbohydrates with a low glycemic index and/or rich in fibers) are not unanimously acknowledged. The hotly debated issue regarding the ideal proportions of carbohydrates and fat advisable for diabetic individuals has lapsed progressively into disuse, all the arguments having run out. At the present time, there remain many unanswered important questions related to nutrition and diabetes because of the lack of long-term randomized studies evaluating the impact of a diet modification on morbidity and mortality. Considering the difficulties of changing our usual feeding patterns on a long term basis, these uncertainties will not readily be solved.
尽管饮食一直被视为糖尿病管理的基石,但饮食建议也在不断演变。目前已达成一些共识,即医学营养治疗的目标应是达到和/或维持合理体重、确保尽可能良好的血糖控制并降低心血管危险因素,但实现这些目标的方法仍在讨论中。除了热量限制(毫无疑问,它非常有效,但肥胖糖尿病患者很难做到)之外,传统措施缓解餐后高血糖(增加进餐频率、食用低血糖指数和/或富含纤维的碳水化合物)的临床益处并未得到一致认可。关于糖尿病患者碳水化合物和脂肪的理想比例这一备受争议的问题已逐渐不再使用,所有论点都已用尽。目前,由于缺乏评估饮食调整对发病率和死亡率影响的长期随机研究,与营养和糖尿病相关的许多重要问题仍未得到解答。考虑到长期改变我们通常的饮食模式存在困难,这些不确定性不会轻易得到解决。