Suppr超能文献

基于CHOP方案化疗后受累野放疗对Ⅲ-Ⅳ期、中级别及大细胞免疫母细胞淋巴瘤的影响。

Impact of involved field radiotherapy after CHOP-based chemotherapy on stage III-IV, intermediate grade and large-cell immunoblastic lymphomas.

作者信息

Schlembach P J, Wilder R B, Tucker S L, Ha C S, Rodriguez M A, Hess M A, Cabanillas F F, Cox J D

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Nov 1;48(4):1107-10. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00760-4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the impact of involved field radiotherapy on local control, freedom from progression, and overall survival in patients with clinical Stage III-IV, intermediate grade, or large-cell immunoblastic lymphomas that responded to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP)-based induction chemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From July 1989 through October 1996, 32 patients with clinical Stage III and 27 patients with clinical Stage IV, intermediate grade, or large-cell immunoblastic lymphomas were prospectively enrolled on two protocols at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. None had previously undergone treatment for lymphoma. The median patient age was 54 years (range: 26-85 years). There were a total of 172 involved sites of disease at presentation. All 59 patients received CHOP-based chemotherapy. At least six cycles of chemotherapy were delivered to 92% of the patients. Involved field radiotherapy (39.6-40.0 Gy in 20-22 fractions in 74% of cases) was administered to 28/59 (47%) patients beginning 3-4 weeks after chemotherapy. Sites were irradiated at the discretion of the treating physician. Irradiated and nonirradiated groups were compared in terms of maximum pre-chemotherapy tumor size and University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center tumor score. Kaplan-Meier estimates of local control per patient, freedom from progression, and overall survival for the irradiated and nonirradiated groups were calculated in terms of the stage of disease and treatment delivered. The resulting curves were compared using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the prognostic significance of tumor size, tumor score, treatment delivered, and stage.

RESULTS

The median length of follow-up for all patients was 53 months (range: 4-96 months). The median tumor size at the start of chemotherapy in irradiated patients was 4.5 cm (range: 0-15 cm) versus 3 cm (range: 0-7 cm) in nonirradiated patients (p = 0.004). The irradiated and nonirradiated groups were not significantly different in terms of tumor scores. Radiotherapy improved (p = 0.001) local control (5-year rates: 89% versus 52%) for Stages III and IV combined. This benefit was due to the dramatic improvement (p = 0.0009) in local control for patients with lymphomas measuring > or =4 cm at the start of chemotherapy (5-year rates: 89% for irradiated patients versus 33% for nonirradiated patients). Radiotherapy also improved (p = 0.003) freedom from progression (5-year rates: 85% for irradiated patients versus 51% for nonirradiated patients) for Stages III and IV combined. On multivariate analysis, radiotherapy was the most significant factor affecting local control and freedom from progression. Overall survival was not significantly different (p = 0. 620) between irradiated and nonirradiated patients (5-year rates: 87% versus 81%, respectively). When Stages III and IV were analyzed separately, radiotherapy improved local control and freedom from progression but not overall survival. Radiotherapy was tolerated reasonably well, with the main toxicity being moderate myelosuppression. Eleven out of 12 (92%) patients with recurrent disease at the time of their last follow-up visit were treated initially with chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

Involved field radiotherapy improved local control and freedom from progression in patients with > or = 4 cm Stage III-IV, intermediate grade, or large-cell immunoblastic lymphomas that responded to CHOP-based induction chemotherapy. Involved field radiotherapy was tolerated reasonably well.

摘要

目的

分析累及野放疗对接受环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松(CHOP)方案诱导化疗有效的临床Ⅲ-Ⅳ期、中级别或大细胞免疫母细胞淋巴瘤患者的局部控制、无进展生存期和总生存期的影响。

方法和材料

1989年7月至1996年10月,32例临床Ⅲ期和27例临床Ⅳ期、中级别或大细胞免疫母细胞淋巴瘤患者前瞻性地入组了德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心的两项研究方案。此前均未接受过淋巴瘤治疗。患者中位年龄为54岁(范围:26 - 85岁)。初诊时共有172个疾病累及部位。所有59例患者均接受了基于CHOP的化疗。92%的患者接受了至少六个周期的化疗。28/59例(47%)患者在化疗开始3 - 4周后开始接受累及野放疗(74%的病例给予39.6 - 40.0 Gy,分20 - 22次)。放疗部位由治疗医师酌情决定。比较放疗组和未放疗组化疗前最大肿瘤大小和德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心肿瘤评分。根据疾病分期和所接受的治疗,计算放疗组和未放疗组患者的局部控制、无进展生存期和总生存期的Kaplan-Meier估计值。使用对数秩检验比较所得曲线。采用Cox比例风险模型评估肿瘤大小、肿瘤评分、所接受的治疗和分期的预后意义。

结果

所有患者的中位随访时间为53个月(范围:4 - 96个月)。放疗患者化疗开始时的中位肿瘤大小为4.5 cm(范围:0 - 15 cm),未放疗患者为3 cm(范围:0 - 7 cm)(p = 0.004)。放疗组和未放疗组在肿瘤评分方面无显著差异。放疗改善了(p = 0.001)Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期合并患者的局部控制(5年率:89%对52%)。这一益处归因于化疗开始时肿瘤≥4 cm的淋巴瘤患者局部控制的显著改善(p = 0.0009)(5年率:放疗患者为89%,未放疗患者为33%)。放疗也改善了(p = 0.003)Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期合并患者的无进展生存期(5年率:放疗患者为85%,未放疗患者为51%)。多因素分析显示,放疗是影响局部控制和无进展生存期的最显著因素。放疗组和未放疗组患者的总生存期无显著差异(p = 0.620)(5年率:分别为87%和81%)。当分别分析Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期时,放疗改善了局部控制和无进展生存期,但未改善总生存期。放疗耐受性较好,主要毒性为中度骨髓抑制。12例末次随访时复发的患者中有11例(92%)最初仅接受了化疗。

结论

累及野放疗改善了对基于CHOP方案诱导化疗有效的Ⅲ-Ⅳ期、中级别或大细胞免疫母细胞淋巴瘤且肿瘤≥4 cm患者的局部控制和无进展生存期。累及野放疗耐受性较好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验