Prasanna Simha M, Bhat P S, Ashok Kumar K, Prabhudev N
Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiology, Bangalore 560 002, India.
Heart Surg Forum. 2000;3(2):134-6; discussion 136-7.
A surgical cut-down may be necessary when an emergency intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation catheter insertion has to be performed. Closure requires reopening the wound to extract the catheter and close the arteriotomy, or a graft has to be presutured to allow simple ligation. These methods are cumbersome. A method permitting rapid surgical access and easy removal in an intensive care unit is highly desirable. Such an insertion technique that, after insertion, includes placement of transcutaneous hemostatic purse-string sutures was evaluated.
All intra-aortic balloon catheter insertions done between August 1996 and March 2000, where all patients underwent an attempt at percutaneous intra-aortic balloon insertion, were evaluated. Failure to insert the balloon percutaneously was followed by direct surgical exposure and insertion with the placement of 2 transcutaneous purse-string sutures. The balloon pump catheter was removed when deemed appropriate and hemostasis was achieved by compression (percutaneous), or by tying of the preplaced sutures followed by compression. Patients were followed and both groups were compared with respect to mortality and vascular complications and any other complications were noted.
There were 157 intra-aortic balloon insertions. Surgical introduction was required in 9 (5.7%) cases. These represent 17.3% of all emergency introductions. There was no statistical difference in original diagnosis, mortality, or vascular complications. The survivors (8/9) have been followed up for a mean of 2.8 years with no late complications.
The removable transcutaneous suture method permits easy intra-aortic balloon catheter insertion and easy removal in an intensive care unit. This method has not been associated with complications in the follow-up period (mean 2.8 years).
在必须紧急插入主动脉内球囊反搏导管时,可能需要进行手术切开。导管拔除时需要重新打开伤口以取出导管并关闭动脉切开处,或者必须预先缝合血管移植物以便进行简单结扎。这些方法都很繁琐。因此,非常需要一种在重症监护病房中能够快速进行手术操作并便于移除导管的方法。我们评估了一种插入技术,该技术在插入后包括放置经皮止血荷包缝合线。
对1996年8月至2000年3月期间所有进行主动脉内球囊导管插入术的患者进行评估,所有患者均尝试经皮插入主动脉内球囊。经皮插入球囊失败后,直接进行手术暴露并插入,同时放置2根经皮荷包缝合线。在认为合适的时候拔除球囊泵导管,通过压迫(经皮)或系紧预先放置的缝合线后再进行压迫来实现止血。对患者进行随访,并比较两组患者的死亡率、血管并发症以及其他任何并发症情况。
共进行了157次主动脉内球囊插入术。其中9例(5.7%)需要通过手术插入。这些占所有紧急插入病例的17.3%。在初始诊断、死亡率或血管并发症方面没有统计学差异。8名存活患者(共9名)平均随访2.8年,未出现晚期并发症。
可移除经皮缝合线方法便于在重症监护病房中进行主动脉内球囊导管的插入和移除。在随访期(平均2.8年)内,该方法未出现并发症。