Ana'eva N I, Borisov A V, Golikov K V
Med Tekh. 2000 Sep-Oct(5):10-2.
To define the comparative informative value of different radiation diagnostic techniques, such as transcranial Doppler study (TCDS), duplex scanning (DS) of the great arteries of the head, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of vessels of the vessels of Willis and great arteries of the head, digital subtraction angiography (DSA), the authors analyze the results of examination of 15 patients with stenotic lesions of common carotid bifurcations and upper segments of inferior carotids. A full agreement of DSA and MRA findings was revealed in 6 patients; of them 5 and 1 patients had inferior carotid occlusion and subocclusion, respectively. There was mainly a discordance of data on lesion re-evaluation in < 90-99% (MRA revealed a complete lack of blood flow) and < 70% stenosis (changes were estimated as physiological turbulence in the bulb of the inferior carotid while analyzing MR images). A combination of MRA and DS of the great arteries of the head for diagnosis the presence and extent of stenosis and TCDS for evaluation of the activation of collateral circulatory pathways and a cerebrovascular reserve may virtually replace DSA which must probably be used only when the data obtained by different methods.
为了确定不同放射诊断技术的比较信息价值,如经颅多普勒研究(TCDS)、头部大动脉的双功扫描(DS)、 Willis环血管和头部大动脉的磁共振血管造影(MRA)、数字减影血管造影(DSA),作者分析了15例颈总动脉分叉和颈内动脉上段狭窄病变患者的检查结果。6例患者的DSA和MRA结果完全一致;其中5例和1例患者分别有颈内动脉闭塞和次全闭塞。在<90-99%(MRA显示完全无血流)和<70%狭窄(在分析MR图像时,变化被估计为颈内动脉球部的生理性湍流)时,病变重新评估的数据主要存在不一致。将头部大动脉的MRA和DS结合用于诊断狭窄的存在和程度,将TCDS用于评估侧支循环途径的激活和脑血管储备,实际上可能会取代DSA,而DSA可能仅在不同方法获得的数据不一致时才使用。