Villablanca J Pablo, Nael Kambiz, Habibi Reza, Nael Ali, Laub Gerhard, Finn J Paul
Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-7206, USA.
Invest Radiol. 2006 Nov;41(11):799-805. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000242835.00032.f5.
We sought to prospectively evaluate the image quality and visualization of the intracranial arteries using high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) at 3 T and to perform intraindividual comparison with time-of-flight (TOF) MRA and multislice CT angiography (CTA).
Twelve patients (5 men, 7 women, 37-71 years of age) with suspected cerebrovascular disease prospectively underwent MRA and CTA. MRA was performed on a 3 T MR system, including both 3-dimensional (3D) TOF (Voxel dimension: 0.6 x 0.5 x 0.9 mm in 5 minutes and 40 seconds) and 3D CE-MRA (voxel dimension: 0.7 x 0.7 x 0.8 mm in 20 seconds, using parallel acquisition with an acceleration factor of 4). CTA images were acquired on a 16-slice CT scanner (voxel dimension: 0.35 x 0.35 x 0.8 mm in 17 seconds). The image quality and visualization of up to 26 intracranial arterial segments in each study was evaluated by 2 experienced radiologists. The arterial diameter for selective intracranial arteries was measured independently on each of the 3 studies, and statistical analysis and comparative correlation was performed.
A total of 312 arterial segments were examined by CE-MRA, TOF-MRA, and CTA. The majority of intracranial arteries (87%) were visualized with diagnostic image quality on CE-MRA with a significant correlation to TOF (R values = 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.86, P < 0.0001), and to CTA (R values = 0.74; 95% confidence interavl 0.68-0.78, P < 0.001). The image quality for small intracranial arteries, including the anterior-inferior cerebellar artery, the posterior communicating artery, and the M3 branch of the middle cerebral artery, was significantly lower on CE-MRA compared with TOF and CTA (P < 0.03). There was a significant correlation for the dimensional measurements of arterial diameters at CE-MRA with TOF (r = 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.93), and CTA (r = 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.73-0.90).
The described 3 T CE-MRA protocol, spanning from the cervical to the intracranial vessels, visualized and characterized the majority of intracranial arteries with image quality comparable with that obtained using TOF-MRA and CTA. Further clinical studies are required to establish the accuracy of the technique in a broader clinical setting.
我们试图前瞻性地评估3T高空间分辨率对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)对颅内动脉的成像质量和可视化效果,并与时间飞跃(TOF)MRA和多层CT血管造影(CTA)进行个体内比较。
12例(5例男性,7例女性,年龄37 - 71岁)疑似脑血管疾病患者前瞻性地接受了MRA和CTA检查。MRA在3T MR系统上进行,包括三维(3D)TOF(体素尺寸:0.6×0.5×0.9mm,采集时间5分40秒)和3D CE-MRA(体素尺寸:0.7×0.7×0.8mm,采集时间20秒,使用加速因子为4的并行采集)。CTA图像在16层CT扫描仪上采集(体素尺寸:0.35×0.35×0.8mm,采集时间17秒)。两名经验丰富的放射科医生对每项研究中多达26个颅内动脉节段的图像质量和可视化效果进行评估。在三项研究中的每项研究中独立测量选择性颅内动脉的动脉直径,并进行统计分析和比较相关性分析。
CE-MRA、TOF-MRA和CTA共检查了312个动脉节段。大多数颅内动脉(87%)在CE-MRA上以诊断图像质量显示,与TOF有显著相关性(R值 = 0.84;95%置信区间0.79 - 0.86,P < 0.0001),与CTA也有显著相关性(R值 = 0.74;95%置信区间0.68 - 0.78,P < 0.001)。与TOF和CTA相比,CE-MRA上包括小脑前下动脉、后交通动脉和大脑中动脉M₃分支在内的小颅内动脉的图像质量显著较低(P < 0.03)。CE-MRA与TOF(r = 0.88,95%置信区间0.81 - 0.93)以及CTA(r = 0.83,95%置信区间0.73 - 0.90)在动脉直径测量上有显著相关性。
所描述的从颈部到颅内血管的3T CE-MRA方案能够可视化并表征大多数颅内动脉,其成像质量与TOF-MRA和CTA相当。需要进一步的临床研究来确定该技术在更广泛临床环境中的准确性。