• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜输卵管绝育术间隔期并发症:美国绝育协作审查的结果

Complications of interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

作者信息

Jamieson D J, Hillis S D, Duerr A, Marchbanks P A, Costello C, Peterson H B

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;96(6):997-1002. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01082-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01082-6
PMID:11084192
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the risk of intraoperative or postoperative complications for interval laparoscopic tubal sterilizations.

METHODS

We used a prospective, multicenter cohort study of 9475 women who had interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization to calculate the rates of intraoperative or postoperative complications. The relative safety of various methods was assessed by calculating overall complication rates for each major method of tubal occlusion. Method-related complication rates also were calculated and included only complications attributable to a method of occlusion. We used logistic regression to identify independent predictors of one or more complications.

RESULTS

When we used a more restrictive definition of unintended major surgery, the overall rate of complications went from 1.6 to 0.9 per 100 procedures. There was one life-threatening event and there were no deaths. Complications rates for each of the four major methods of tubal occlusion ranged from 1.17 to 1.95, with no significant differences between them. When complication rates were calculated, the spring clip method had the lowest method-related complication rate (0.47 per 100 procedures), although it was not significantly different from the others. In adjusted analysis, diabetes mellitus (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3, 8.8), general anesthesia (OR 3.2; CI 1.6, 6.6), previous abdominal or pelvic surgery (OR 2.0; CI 1.4, 2.9), and obesity (OR 1.7; CI 1.2, 2.6) were independent predictors of one or more complications.

CONCLUSION

Interval laparoscopic sterilization generally is a safe procedure; serious morbidity is rare.

摘要

目的

评估腹腔镜输卵管绝育术术中或术后并发症的风险。

方法

我们对9475例行腹腔镜输卵管绝育术的女性进行了一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究,以计算术中或术后并发症的发生率。通过计算每种主要输卵管阻塞方法的总体并发症发生率来评估各种方法的相对安全性。还计算了与方法相关的并发症发生率,仅包括归因于阻塞方法的并发症。我们使用逻辑回归来确定一种或多种并发症的独立预测因素。

结果

当我们对意外大手术采用更严格的定义时,并发症的总体发生率从每100例手术中的1.6例降至0.9例。发生了1起危及生命的事件,无死亡病例。四种主要输卵管阻塞方法的并发症发生率在1.17至1.95之间,它们之间无显著差异。在计算并发症发生率时,弹簧夹法的与方法相关的并发症发生率最低(每100例手术0.47例),尽管与其他方法无显著差异。在多因素分析中,糖尿病(校正比值比[OR]4.5;95%置信区间[CI]2.3,8.8)、全身麻醉(OR 3.2;CI 1.6,6.6)、既往腹部或盆腔手术(OR 2.0;CI 1.4,2.9)和肥胖(OR 1.7;CI 1.2,2.6)是一种或多种并发症的独立预测因素。

结论

腹腔镜输卵管绝育术通常是一种安全的手术;严重并发症罕见。

相似文献

1
Complications of interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization.腹腔镜输卵管绝育术间隔期并发症:美国绝育协作审查的结果
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;96(6):997-1002. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01082-6.
2
Complications of interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Feb;61(2):153-8.
3
Complications of female sterilization: immediate and delayed.女性绝育的并发症:即时和延迟的。
Fertil Steril. 1984 Mar;41(3):337-55. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47709-5.
4
[Operative complications of laparoscopic tubal sterilization with Bleier clips (author's transl)].
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1982 May;42(5):379-84. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1036780.
5
Unintended laparotomy associated with laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Nov;157(5):1102-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80269-7.
6
The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization.宫腔镜绝育术与腹腔镜绝育术相比的可行性、安全性及有效性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):570.e1-570.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
7
Evaluation of contemporary female sterilization methods.当代女性绝育方法的评估。
J Reprod Med. 1981 Sep;26(9):439-53.
8
A comparison of different laparoscopic sterilization occlusion techniques in 24,439 procedures.24439例手术中不同腹腔镜绝育闭塞技术的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Oct 1;144(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90585-3.
9
Previous abdominal surgery as a risk factor in interval laparoscopic sterilization.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Apr 1;145(7):841-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90689-0.
10
Puerperal laparoscopic sterilization.产后腹腔镜绝育术
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Aug 15;137(8):910-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)32831-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Sterilization, Infecundity, and Reproductive Autonomy in Rural, Suburban, and Urban America: Results From a National Survey.美国农村、郊区和城市的绝育、生育力丧失与生殖自主权:一项全国性调查的结果
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):72-84. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70006. Epub 2025 Mar 16.
2
Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy Versus Standard Tubal Sterilization: Lessons From Offering Women Options for Interval Sterilization.降低风险的输卵管切除术与标准输卵管绝育术:为女性提供间隔期绝育选择的经验教训。
South Med J. 2018 Mar;111(3):173-177. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000779.
3
The effect of obesity on intraoperative complication rates with hysteroscopic compared to laparoscopic sterilization: a retrospective cohort study.
肥胖对宫腔镜绝育术与腹腔镜绝育术术中并发症发生率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Contracept Reprod Med. 2016 Feb 23;1:1. doi: 10.1186/s40834-016-0008-3. eCollection 2016.
4
Essure® present controversies and 5 years' learned lessons: a retrospective study with short- and long-term follow-up.Essure®的争议及5年经验教训:一项短期和长期随访的回顾性研究
Gynecol Surg. 2017;14(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s10397-017-1023-3. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
5
Electrosurgical Settings and Vaginal Cuff Complications.电外科设置与阴道断端并发症
JSLS. 2015 Sep-Dec;19(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00088.
6
Safety and efficacy of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: an observational cohort study.宫腔镜绝育术与腹腔镜绝育术的安全性和有效性比较:一项观察性队列研究。
BMJ. 2015 Oct 13;351:h5162. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5162.
7
Update on permanent contraception options for women.女性永久性避孕方法的最新情况
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;27(6):465-70. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000213.
8
Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.宫腔镜输卵管绝育术:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Oct 1;13(21):1-35. eCollection 2013.
9
Contraception and the obese woman.避孕与肥胖女性
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2013 May;25(5):223-33. doi: 10.1111/1745-7599.12011. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
10
Evidence-based guidance on Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use: identification of research gaps.《避孕使用特定实践建议的循证指南:研究差距识别》
Contraception. 2013 May;87(5):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Oct 18.