• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[细胞学经验较少的研究者对淋巴结细胞学检查结果解读的可靠性——一项针对兽医学学生的研究]

[Reliability of the interpretation of lymph node cytology by investigators with little cytologic experience--a study with students of veterinary medicine].

作者信息

Mischke R

机构信息

Klinik für kleine Haustiere, Tierärztlichen Hochschule Hannover.

出版信息

Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2000 Oct;113(10):384-7.

PMID:11084756
Abstract

The aim of this study was to calculate the reliability of the examination of lymph node cytologies by individuals with little experience in the field of cytology. After an introduction comparable to the content of a cytology seminar, 11 students of veterinary medicine were asked to assess 20 slides with different lymphadenopathies (hyperplasia: n = 4, lymphadenitis: n = 4, malignant lymphoma: n = 4, different other neoplasias: n = 8). A correct classification according to these categories was achieved on the average (median value) in 18 of the 20 cases (minimum: 16, maximum: 20). The majority of the investigators also found a correct further differentiation for some slides, particularly with respect to the type of non-lymphatic neoplasia. The results of this study emphasize that the experience gained in a single cytology seminar enables only few individuals to reliably differentiate lymphadenopathies. The error rate, which was 10 to 20% for the majority of the investigators, however, has to be assessed critically due to the clinical consequences of misdiagnosis. This emphasizes the necessity of experience even for interpretation of lymph node cytology.

摘要

本研究的目的是计算细胞学领域经验不足的人员对淋巴结细胞学检查的可靠性。在进行了一场与细胞学研讨会内容相当的介绍后,11名兽医学专业学生被要求评估20张患有不同淋巴结病的玻片(增生:n = 4,淋巴结炎:n = 4,恶性淋巴瘤:n = 4,其他不同肿瘤:n = 8)。在20个病例中,平均(中位数)有18例(最小值:16,最大值:20)实现了根据这些类别进行的正确分类。大多数研究者还发现,对于一些玻片能够进行正确的进一步鉴别,特别是在非淋巴性肿瘤的类型方面。本研究结果强调,仅通过一次细胞学研讨会获得的经验,只有少数人能够可靠地鉴别淋巴结病。然而,由于误诊的临床后果,大多数研究者10%至20%的错误率必须得到严格评估。这强调了即使对于淋巴结细胞学的解读也需要经验。

相似文献

1
[Reliability of the interpretation of lymph node cytology by investigators with little cytologic experience--a study with students of veterinary medicine].[细胞学经验较少的研究者对淋巴结细胞学检查结果解读的可靠性——一项针对兽医学学生的研究]
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2000 Oct;113(10):384-7.
2
[Lymph node cytology].[淋巴结细胞学]
Tierarztl Prax. 1994 Dec;22(6):592-5.
3
The role of fine needle aspiration cytology and imprint cytology in cervical lymphadenopathy.细针穿刺细胞学检查和印片细胞学检查在颈部淋巴结病中的作用。
Saudi Med J. 2004 Jul;25(7):862-5.
4
[The role of morphological characteristics of lymph nodes in differential diagnosis of reactive lymphadenopathies].[淋巴结形态学特征在反应性淋巴结病鉴别诊断中的作用]
Ter Arkh. 2005;77(4):37-43.
5
Lymphadenomegaly in dogs--cytological study.犬淋巴结肿大——细胞学研究
Pol J Vet Sci. 2009;12(2):263-8.
6
Lymph node cytology.淋巴结细胞学
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2003 Jan;33(1):47-67, v. doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(02)00055-4.
7
[Paraneoplastic lymphadenopathy].[副肿瘤性淋巴结病]
Ter Arkh. 2007;79(8):44-52.
8
[Laboratory diagnosis. (10). Points of differential diagnosis, by biopsy of systemic lymph node diseases].[实验室诊断。(10). 系统性淋巴结疾病活检的鉴别诊断要点]
Saishin Igaku. 1966 Apr;21(4):878-88.
9
Morphometric evaluation of nucleolar organiser regions in reactive and neoplastic lymph node lesions.反应性和肿瘤性淋巴结病变中核仁组织区的形态计量学评估
J Indian Med Assoc. 2006 Jan;104(1):16-8, 24.
10
A review of sentinel lymph node evaluation and the need for its incorporation into veterinary oncology.前哨淋巴结评估及其纳入兽医肿瘤学的必要性综述。
Vet Comp Oncol. 2009 Jun;7(2):81-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5829.2009.00183.x.