Phillips R J, Powley T L
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 165 Peirce Hall, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000 Nov;34(1-2):1-26. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(00)00036-9.
Electrophysiological and morphological analyses of vagal mechanoreceptors in the gut wall suggest conflicting conclusions. Electrophysiology has distinguished a single general class of ending in smooth muscle, one characterized as an 'in series' tension receptor. Morphology, in contrast, has characterized two distinct specializations of vagal afferent endings in the muscle wall of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. These two structures differ in terms of their target tissues, terminal architectures and regional distributions; they also develop on different ontogenetic timetables and depend on different trophic support in the muscle wall. On the basis of these features, we have proposed that one of the putative mechanoreceptors, the intraganglionic laminar ending (IGLE), has characteristics of a tension receptor and the other, the intramuscular array (IMA), has features of a stretch or length receptor. In a functional analogy with striated muscle proprioceptors, IGLEs should have similarities to Golgi tendon organs, whereas IMAs should have equivalencies with muscle spindle afferents. The present survey re-examines the recording analyses in light of the structural observations. This review indicates that previous electrophysiological studies are too inconclusive to refute the inference that the vagus supplies two distinct types of mechanoreceptors to the muscle wall of the GI tract. Multiple methodological constraints and sources of variance have limited the resolution of electrophysiological experiments. Specifically, these experiments have conventionally used distension stimuli that confound tension and stretch. In addition, sampling strategies have biased recording experiments towards a focus on one type of ending, the IGLE. Furthermore, putative functional properties (e.g., broad tuning) of vagal mechanoreceptors suggest that distinguishing two recording patterns will require exacting protocols. Combining a recognition of the methodological difficulties that have limited electrophysiological analyses with an understanding of the structural features of the endings, however, suggests several critical electrophysiological experiments with the resolution to distinguish two classes of response profiles. Until such experiments can be conducted, sensory physiology's axiom that 'function varies with form', taken together with a re-assessment of the existing data, suggests that the vagus nerve supplies stretch receptors as well as tension receptors to the wall of the GI tract.
对肠壁迷走机械感受器的电生理和形态学分析得出了相互矛盾的结论。电生理学已区分出平滑肌中单一的一类末梢,其特征为“串联”张力感受器。相比之下,形态学则描述了胃肠道(GI)肌壁中迷走传入末梢的两种不同特化形式。这两种结构在其靶组织、终末结构和区域分布方面存在差异;它们在不同的个体发育时间表上发育,并且在肌壁中依赖于不同的营养支持。基于这些特征,我们提出一种假定的机械感受器,即神经节内板层末梢(IGLE),具有张力感受器的特征,而另一种,即肌内排列(IMA),具有牵张或长度感受器的特征。在与横纹肌本体感受器的功能类比中,IGLE应与高尔基腱器官相似,而IMA应与肌梭传入纤维等效。本综述根据结构观察结果重新审视了记录分析。该综述表明,先前的电生理研究尚无定论,无法反驳迷走神经向胃肠道肌壁提供两种不同类型机械感受器的推断。多种方法学限制和变异来源限制了电生理实验的分辨率。具体而言,这些实验传统上使用的扩张刺激混淆了张力和牵张。此外,采样策略使记录实验偏向于关注一种类型的末梢,即IGLE。此外,迷走机械感受器的假定功能特性(例如,广泛调谐)表明,区分两种记录模式将需要严格的实验方案。然而,将对限制电生理分析的方法学困难的认识与对末梢结构特征的理解相结合,提出了一些关键的电生理实验,这些实验具有区分两类反应谱的分辨率。在能够进行此类实验之前,感觉生理学的公理“功能随形式而变化”,再加上对现有数据的重新评估,表明迷走神经向胃肠道壁提供牵张感受器以及张力感受器。