Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(贝那普利)与钙拮抗剂(硝苯地平或氨氯地平)联合治疗与大剂量钙拮抗剂单药治疗系统性高血压的疗效及副作用比较。

Comparison of efficacy and side effects of combination therapy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (benazepril) with calcium antagonist (either nifedipine or amlodipine) versus high-dose calcium antagonist monotherapy for systemic hypertension.

作者信息

Messerli F H, Oparil S, Feng Z

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Ochsner Clinic and Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2000 Dec 1;86(11):1182-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01199-1.

Abstract

The present 2 multicenter studies were designed to evaluate whether patients with essential hypertension derived equal benefits from use of combination therapy with a calcium antagonist and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor as from doubling the dose of the calcium antagonist. After a 2-week washout and a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period, a total of 1,390 patients were treated with either nifedipine 30 mg (study 1) or amlodipine 5 mg (study 2) once daily for 4 weeks. The 1,079 patients whose diastolic blood pressure remained between 95 and 115 mm Hg were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind therapy with amlodipine 5 mg/benazepril 10 mg, amlodipine 5 mg/ benazepril 20 mg, nifedipine 30 mg or nifedipine 60 mg (study 1), and amlodipine 5 mg/benazepril 10 mg, amlodipine 5 mg/benazepril 20 mg, amlodipine 5 mg or amlodipine 10 mg (study 2). Both doses of the calcium antagonist/ACE inhibitor combination therapy lowered diastolic pressure as much as the high dose and significantly better than the lower dose of calcium antagonist monotherapy (with either nifedipine or amlodipine). However, 15% of patients in the nifedipine high-dose monotherapy group and 24% in the amlodipine high-dose monotherapy group presented with some form of edema. In contrast, the incidence of edema was similar for patients treated with both combination therapy and low-dose calcium antagonists. Thus, combination therapy with a calcium antagonist and an ACE inhibitor provides blood pressure control equal to that of high-dose calcium antagonist monotherapy but with significantly fewer dose-dependent adverse experiences such as vasodilatory edema. Inc.

摘要

目前的这两项多中心研究旨在评估原发性高血压患者使用钙拮抗剂与血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂联合治疗是否与将钙拮抗剂剂量加倍获得相同益处。经过2周的洗脱期和2周的单盲安慰剂导入期后,共有1390例患者接受硝苯地平30mg(研究1)或氨氯地平5mg(研究2)每日一次治疗4周。舒张压维持在95至115mmHg之间的1079例患者被随机分配接受氨氯地平5mg/贝那普利10mg、氨氯地平5mg/贝那普利20mg、硝苯地平30mg或硝苯地平60mg(研究1),以及氨氯地平5mg/贝那普利10mg、氨氯地平5mg/贝那普利20mg、氨氯地平5mg或氨氯地平10mg(研究2)的8周双盲治疗。钙拮抗剂/ACE抑制剂联合治疗的两种剂量降低舒张压的程度与高剂量相当,且显著优于低剂量钙拮抗剂单药治疗(硝苯地平或氨氯地平)。然而,硝苯地平高剂量单药治疗组15%的患者和氨氯地平高剂量单药治疗组24%的患者出现了某种形式的水肿。相比之下,联合治疗组和低剂量钙拮抗剂治疗组患者的水肿发生率相似。因此,钙拮抗剂与ACE抑制剂联合治疗可提供与高剂量钙拮抗剂单药治疗相当的血压控制,但剂量依赖性不良事件(如血管舒张性水肿)显著减少。公司

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验