Prestileo T, Mazzola G, Di Lorenzo F, Colletti P, Vitale F, Ferraro D, Di Stefano R, Cammà C, Craxì A
Division Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Casa del Sole, Palermo, Italy.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2000 Nov;16(3):373-8. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(00)00259-4.
In patients with chronic hepatitis C and HIV infection, responsiveness to the standard schedule of alpha-interferon (IFN) is unsatisfactory. To quantify the effectiveness of tailoring IFN dosage according to HCV viral load under treatment, we enrolled 41 patients (M/F 32/9) chronically coinfected by HCV and HIV with chronic liver disease. All were former i.v. drug addicts, with a mean age of 32+/-4 years, and had clinical and histological evidence of chronic hepatitis (10% with cirrhosis). The CDC stage was A1 in five, A2 in 14, A3 in eight, B2 in eight, B3 in three and C3 in three. Twenty four patients were on triple therapy with protease inhibitors, 11 were on two-drug anti-HIV regimens and three were untreated. IFN (alphan1 interferon) was started at 3 MU tiw and increased at 6 MU tiw at 4 weeks if serum HCV-RNA had not dropped by at least 50%. IFN was stopped at 24 weeks in non-responders. Eleven patients received a dose increase (total IFN dose at 24 weeks 396 MU), while 16 did not increase the initial dose (total IFN dose at 24 weeks 216 MU). Fourteen subjects stopped within the first weeks due to relapse of drug abuse (ten) or subjective intolerance (four). ALT and HCV-RNA levels were markedly decreased at week 4, and this reduction lasted up to 24 weeks. However only one patient had a complete biochemical and virological end-of-treatment response, which was maintained over a 24 weeks post-therapy follow-up. All other patients relapsed to baseline ALT and HCV-RNA values after stopping IFN. HIV viral load was slightly reduced under IFN therapy, while CD4 counts were unaffected. We conclude that raising the dose of IFN dose not eradicate HCV in most HIV-infected patients, even when HIV is well controlled by treatment. HCV viraemia and necroinflammation are temporarily suppressed by IFN, but the relevance of these surrogate endpoints to progression of liver disease and to survival cannot be assessed.
在慢性丙型肝炎合并HIV感染的患者中,对标准疗程的α干扰素(IFN)治疗反应不佳。为了量化在治疗过程中根据HCV病毒载量调整IFN剂量的有效性,我们纳入了41例慢性丙型肝炎合并HIV感染且患有慢性肝病的患者(男32例/女9例)。所有患者均曾为静脉吸毒者,平均年龄32±4岁,有慢性肝炎的临床和组织学证据(10%为肝硬化)。疾病控制中心(CDC)分期为A1期5例,A2期14例,A3期8例,B2期8例,B3期3例,C3期3例。24例患者接受蛋白酶抑制剂三联疗法,11例接受二线抗HIV治疗方案,3例未接受治疗。IFN(αn1干扰素)起始剂量为3MU,每周3次,若4周时血清HCV-RNA未下降至少50%,则在4周时增加至6MU,每周3次。无反应者在24周时停用IFN。11例患者增加了剂量(24周时IFN总剂量为396MU),而16例未增加初始剂量(24周时IFN总剂量为216MU)。14例患者在最初几周内因药物滥用复发(10例)或主观不耐受(4例)而停药。第4周时ALT和HCV-RNA水平显著下降,且这种下降持续至24周。然而,只有1例患者在治疗结束时获得了完全的生化和病毒学反应,并在治疗后24周的随访中得以维持。所有其他患者在停用IFN后ALT和HCV-RNA值均恢复至基线水平。IFN治疗期间HIV病毒载量略有下降,而CD4细胞计数未受影响。我们得出结论,即使HIV通过治疗得到良好控制,在大多数HIV感染患者中增加IFN剂量也不能根除HCV。IFN可暂时抑制HCV病毒血症和坏死性炎症,但这些替代终点与肝病进展和生存的相关性尚无法评估。