Suppr超能文献

Intensive care nursing scoring system. Part 1: Classification of nursing diagnoses.

作者信息

Pyykkö A K, Laurila J, Ala-Kokko T I, Hentinen M, Janhonen S A

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Health Administration, University of Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2000 Dec;16(6):345-56. doi: 10.1054/iccn.2000.1525.

Abstract

The introduction of computer-based information management systems to intensive care units offers new possibilities to describe and document the content of nursing. In different countries and health care organizations, the hospital culture and the approach taken by nurses and medical colleagues determine what, how and to what extent nursing is documented. There are nursing diagnosis classifications that are used in North America, such as NANDA (North American Nursing Diagnosis Association), and the European Union Telenurse project will promote the use of the ICNP (International Classifications of Nursing Practice) throughout Europe. The above classifications are used to describe individual, family or community responses to potential or actual health problems or life processes. But there is no nursing diagnosis classification that would take into account both the aims and the unique context of intensive care nursing. This first article describes part of our research: the action research process and the result of the development of a nursing diagnosis classification compatible with the goals of intensive care in three adult intensive care units in the Oulu University Hospital. The classification of nursing diagnoses is part of the Intensive Care Nursing Scoring System (ICNSS) which was developed in the course of this study. The other parts deal with nursing outcomes and nursing interventions. ICNSS is used to facilitate information exchange in the process of intensive care nursing and to describe the nursing workload.

摘要

相似文献

1
Intensive care nursing scoring system. Part 1: Classification of nursing diagnoses.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2000 Dec;16(6):345-56. doi: 10.1054/iccn.2000.1525.
2
Meeting the criteria of a nursing diagnosis classification: Evaluation of ICNP, ICF, NANDA and ZEFP.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jul;44(5):702-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.001. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
3
Intensive Care Nursing Scoring System Part 2: nursing interventions and nursing outcomes.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2001 Feb;17(1):16-27. doi: 10.1054/iccn.2000.1540.
6
Evaluation of the implementation of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes.
Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2009 Jan-Mar;20(1):9-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2008.01108.x.
7
Putting policy into practice: pre- and posttests of implementing standardized languages for nursing documentation.
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Oct;16(10):1826-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01836.x.
9
Nursing diagnoses: factors affecting their use in charting standardized care plans.
J Clin Nurs. 2005 May;14(5):640-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00909.x.
10
Swedish Registered Nurses' incentives to use nursing diagnoses in clinical practice.
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Aug;15(8):936-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01459.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the nursing workload per shift in the ICU.
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Sep;38(9):1438-44. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2648-3. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
2
Validation of the new Intensive Care Nursing Scoring System (ICNSS).
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Feb;30(2):254-259. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2040-4. Epub 2004 Jan 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验