Boymans M, Dreschler W A
Academic Medical Centre, Department of Clinical and Experimental Audiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Audiology. 2000 Sep-Oct;39(5):260-8. doi: 10.3109/00206090009073090.
In this study, we measured the effects of a digital hearing aid on speech recognition or reception in noise for two noise reduction concepts: active noise reduction by speech-sensitive processing (SSP) and improved directionality by a dual- or so-called twin-microphone system (TMS). This was conducted in a well-controlled clinical field trial in 16 hearing-aid users, using a single-blind crossover design. The hearing aid fitting was controlled by insertion gain measurements and measurements with loudness scaling. This study combined laboratory experiments with three consecutive field trials of 4 weeks each. We used performance measurements (speech recognition tests in background noise), paired comparisons, and self-report measurements (questionnaires). The speech recognition or reception tests were performed before and after each field trial, the paired comparisons were performed in weeks 4 and 12, and the questionnaires were administered after each field trial. For all subjects, results were obtained for three different settings: no noise reduction, SSP alone, and TMS alone. In the last week, we also performed speech recognition or reception tests in background noise with both noise reduction concepts combined. Three types of results have been reported: "objective" results from the critical signal to noise ratios for speech recognition or reception in different background noises for different settings and "subjective" results: paired comparisons and questionnaires. The subjective scores show the same trend as the objective scores. The effects of TMS were clearly positive, especially for the speech reception threshold tests and for the paired comparisons. The effects of SSP were much smaller but showed significant benefits with respect to aversiveness and speech perception or reception in noise for specific acoustical environments. There was no extra benefit from the combined effect of SSP and TMS relative to TMS alone.
在本研究中,我们针对两种降噪概念,测量了数字助听器对噪声环境中语音识别或接收的影响:通过语音敏感处理(SSP)实现的有源降噪,以及通过双麦克风或所谓的双麦克风系统(TMS)实现的改进方向性。这是在16名助听器使用者中进行的一项严格控制的临床现场试验,采用单盲交叉设计。助听器的适配通过插入增益测量和响度缩放测量来控制。本研究将实验室实验与连续三个为期4周的现场试验相结合。我们使用了性能测量(背景噪声中的语音识别测试)、配对比较和自我报告测量(问卷调查)。语音识别或接收测试在每个现场试验前后进行,配对比较在第4周和第12周进行,问卷调查在每个现场试验后进行。对于所有受试者,获得了三种不同设置的结果:无降噪、仅使用SSP、仅使用TMS。在最后一周,我们还在背景噪声中同时结合两种降噪概念进行了语音识别或接收测试。已报告了三种类型的结果:不同设置下在不同背景噪声中语音识别或接收的临界信噪比的“客观”结果,以及“主观”结果:配对比较和问卷调查。主观评分与客观评分显示出相同的趋势。TMS的效果明显为正,特别是对于语音接收阈值测试和配对比较。SSP的效果要小得多,但在特定声学环境下,在厌恶感以及噪声中的语音感知或接收方面显示出显著益处。相对于单独使用TMS,SSP和TMS的联合效果没有额外益处。