Suppr超能文献

头影测量标志点计算机自动识别的准确性。

Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks.

作者信息

Liu J K, Chen Y T, Cheng K S

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Nov;118(5):535-40. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.110168.

Abstract

Computerized cephalometric analysis can include both landmark identification and determination of linear or angular measurements. Although its use is time saving compared with a manual method, the accuracy of automatic landmark identification remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a computerized automatic landmark identification system that used an edge-based technique. The technique divides the scanned cephalogram into 8 rectangular subimage regions. After the resolution of these subimages is reduced, the edges are detected and the landmarks are located automatically. Thirteen landmarks were selected for assessment on a set of 10 test cephalograms. The results showed that the errors between manual and computerized identification for landmarks were not significantly different (P > .05) for 5 of 13 landmarks: sella, nasion, porion, orbitale, and gnathion. These results suggest that the accuracy of computerized automatic identification is acceptable for certain landmarks only. Further studies to improve the accuracy of computerized automated landmark identification are needed.

摘要

计算机头影测量分析既可以包括标志点识别,也可以包括线性或角度测量的确定。尽管与手动方法相比,其使用节省时间,但自动标志点识别的准确性仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估一种使用基于边缘技术的计算机自动标志点识别系统的准确性。该技术将扫描的头影图划分为8个矩形子图像区域。在降低这些子图像的分辨率后,检测边缘并自动定位标志点。在一组10张测试头影图上选择了13个标志点进行评估。结果显示,13个标志点中有5个(蝶鞍、鼻根点、耳点、眶点和颏下点)的手动识别与计算机识别之间的误差无显著差异(P>.05)。这些结果表明,计算机自动识别的准确性仅对某些标志点是可接受的。需要进一步研究以提高计算机自动标志点识别的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验