Armstrong K, Calzone K, Stopfer J, Fitzgerald G, Coyne J, Weber B
Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center, Philadelphia 19104-6021, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Nov;9(11):1251-4.
Testing for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 can provide important information about breast and ovarian cancer risk to a small but identifiable subgroup of women. Women who test positive for a BRCA1/2 mutation can pursue more aggressive cancer surveillance and prevention regimens. Among families with known mutations, women who test negative may avoid unnecessary interventions. Currently, little is known about the factors associated with the use of clinical BRCA1/2 testing. The objective of this study was to determine the factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing among women undergoing clinical BRCA1/2 counseling through a retrospective cohort study of women who participated in a university-based clinic offering breast cancer risk assessment, genetic counseling, and BRCA1/2 testing between January 1996 and April 1998. From the 251 eligible women who responded to a follow-up survey, 125 (50%) had undergone or were undergoing BRCA1/2 testing, 86 (34%) had decided not to undergo testing, and 40 (16%) were undecided about testing. After multivariate adjustment, we found that women who chose to undergo BRCA1/2 testing were more likely to have a known familial mutation [odds ratio (OR), 7.46; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.97-62.16], more likely to be Ashkenazi Jewish (OR, 6.37; 95% CI, 2.68-15.12), more likely to want cancer risk information for family members (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 0.99-4.14), more likely to want information about ovarian cancer risk (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.18-3.69), and less likely to be concerned about insurance or job discrimination (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-0.94). These associations were also found in the subgroup of women with a predicted probability of a BRCA1 mutation of 25%. Our study suggests that approximately half of eligible women choose to undergo clinical BRCA1/2 testing after participating in counseling. Women who have the highest risk of carrying a mutation, and thus the greatest probability of gaining some useful information from the test results, are most likely to undergo testing. Women who undergo testing are also more interested in ovarian cancer risk information and less concerned about job and insurance discrimination.
检测BRCA1和BRCA2基因的突变情况,可为一小部分但可识别的女性亚组提供有关乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险的重要信息。BRCA1/2基因突变检测呈阳性的女性可采取更积极的癌症监测和预防方案。在已知存在突变的家族中,检测呈阴性的女性可避免不必要的干预措施。目前,对于与临床BRCA1/2检测使用相关的因素知之甚少。本研究的目的是通过对1996年1月至1998年4月期间在一家提供乳腺癌风险评估、遗传咨询和BRCA1/2检测的大学诊所就诊的女性进行回顾性队列研究,确定与接受临床BRCA1/2检测决策相关的因素。在对251名符合条件且回复了随访调查的女性中,125名(50%)已经或正在接受BRCA1/2检测,86名(34%)决定不进行检测,40名(16%)对检测犹豫不决。经过多变量调整后,我们发现选择接受BRCA1/2检测的女性更有可能存在已知的家族突变[比值比(OR),7.46;95%置信区间(CI),0.97 - 62.16],更有可能是阿什肯纳兹犹太人(OR,6.37;95% CI,2.68 - 15.12),更有可能希望获取家庭成员的癌症风险信息(OR,1.93;95% CI,0.99 - 4.14),更有可能希望了解卵巢癌风险信息(OR,1.69;95% CI,1.18 - 3.69),且不太可能担心保险或工作歧视问题(OR,0.45;95% CI,0.21 - 0.94)。在预测BRCA1基因突变概率为25%的女性亚组中也发现了这些关联。我们的研究表明,约一半符合条件的女性在接受咨询后选择进行临床BRCA1/2检测。携带突变风险最高、因此从检测结果中获得一些有用信息可能性最大的女性最有可能接受检测。接受检测的女性对卵巢癌风险信息也更感兴趣,且不太担心工作和保险歧视问题。