Auerbach A D, Nelson E A, Lindenauer P K, Pantilat S Z, Katz P P, Wachter R M
Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco California, USA.
Am J Med. 2000 Dec 1;109(8):648-53. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00597-0.
We sought to determine the availability and utilization of, as well as physician attitudes toward, the hospitalist model in the United States.
Using a telephone survey, we asked physicians who were board certified in internal medicine about their inpatient practice arrangements, the availability of hospitalist services, and their attitudes toward the hospitalist model. All physicians were generalists in active clinical practice. Using multivariable methods, we determined factors associated with attitudes toward the hospitalist model.
We were able to contact 787 of 2,829 physicians who were randomly selected from a national list of board-certified internists, of whom 400 agreed to participate. Most respondents were familiar with the term "hospitalist" and had hospitalist services available in their community, and 28% used hospitalists for their inpatients. Few (2%) reported the presence of the "mandatory" hospitalist model. Physicians reported that the model was more commonly available in Western states (84% vs. 55% to 63% in other regions, P<0.0001). Seventy-three percent thought hospitalist systems would reduce continuity of care. Only 28% thought that patients would prefer care from an inpatient specialist, but 51% thought patients might get better care, and 47% thought patients might get more cost-effective care in a hospitalist system. In multivariable models, physicians who were in solo practice, those in specialties with more inpatient practice, and those who had more patients hospitalized each month responded more negatively about the model, whereas those with hospitalists in their community were more positive.
Although agreeing that quality of care and efficiency might be improved, physicians were concerned about patient-doctor relationships and patient satisfaction in a hospitalist model. Future studies should determine the effect of the hospitalist model on these outcomes.
我们试图确定美国医院医师模式的可及性、利用情况以及医生对其的态度。
通过电话调查,我们询问了内科专业委员会认证的医生关于他们的住院患者诊疗安排、医院医师服务的可及性以及他们对医院医师模式的态度。所有医生均为从事临床工作的全科医生。我们使用多变量方法确定与对医院医师模式态度相关的因素。
我们能够联系到从全国内科专业委员会认证医生名单中随机抽取的2829名医生中的787名,其中400名同意参与。大多数受访者熟悉“医院医师”一词,其所在社区有医院医师服务,28%的受访者在其住院患者诊疗中使用了医院医师。很少有受访者(2%)报告存在“强制”医院医师模式。医生们报告称该模式在西部各州更为常见(84%,而其他地区为55%至63%,P<0.0001)。73%的医生认为医院医师系统会降低医疗连续性。只有28%的医生认为患者会更倾向于接受住院专科医生的治疗,但51%的医生认为患者可能会得到更好的治疗,47%的医生认为患者在医院医师系统中可能会得到更具成本效益的治疗。在多变量模型中,独立执业的医生、住院诊疗实践较多的专科医生以及每月有更多住院患者的医生对该模式的反应更为负面,而其所在社区有医院医师的医生则更为积极。
尽管医生们认同医院医师模式可能会提高医疗质量和效率,但他们担心该模式下的医患关系和患者满意度。未来的研究应确定医院医师模式对这些结果的影响。