Payne B R, Lomber S G, Gelston C D
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Center for Advanced Biomedical Research, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Behav Brain Res. 2000 Dec 20;117(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00276-x.
We compared the abilities of intact cats and cats that incurred lesions of areas 17 and 18 in adulthood, at one month of age (P28), or on the day of birth (P1), to detect and orient towards visual stimuli either moved into or illuminated in the periphery of the visual field, and to detect and orient towards a stationary, broad-band white-noise auditory stimulus. For all groups of cats, movement of a stimulus into the visual field was a more potent stimulus for evoking visually-guided orienting movements than illumination of a static light-emitting diode (LED). The potency of the auditory stimulus was also extremely high. Proficiency on both visual tasks was graded according to the age at which areas 17 and 18 were ablated in the sequence: adult, P1, P28 and intact in the sequence worst-->best performance. The superior performance of the P1- and P28-groups provided evidence for sparing of visually-guided orienting, but the sparing was incomplete because it did not match performance of intact cats. Lesions of areas 17 and 18 incurred in adulthood had no significant impact on orienting to auditory white-noise stimuli. However, orienting performance to auditory stimuli presented in the peripheral quadrants was slightly superior in the P28 group and reduced in the P1 group. Thus, the visual sparing exhibited by the P1 group may be at the expense of highly proficient orienting to auditory cues. Overall, these results extend our knowledge by showing that in addition to P1-cats, cats that incur lesions of areas 17 and 18 at one month-of-age also exhibit sparing of visually-guided orienting, and that the sparing is not confined to a single stimulation paradigm. Finally, the covariation in the magnitude of pathway modifications with the scale of the orienting proficiency in P1- and P28 cats helps to solidify the linkage between rewired brain pathways and spared visually-guided behaviors.
我们比较了成年期、1月龄(P28)或出生当天(P1)时发生17区和18区损伤的猫与完整猫检测并朝向移入视野周边或在视野周边被照亮的视觉刺激物定向的能力,以及检测并朝向静止的宽带白噪声听觉刺激物定向的能力。对于所有猫组而言,刺激物移入视野比静态发光二极管(LED)发光更能有效激发视觉引导的定向运动。听觉刺激的效力也极高。两项视觉任务的熟练程度根据17区和18区被切除的年龄按如下顺序分级:成年、P1、P28以及完整,顺序为表现最差→最佳。P1组和P28组的卓越表现为视觉引导定向的保留提供了证据,但这种保留并不完全,因为它与完整猫的表现不匹配。成年期发生的17区和18区损伤对朝向听觉白噪声刺激物的定向没有显著影响。然而,P28组中对周边象限呈现的听觉刺激物的定向表现略优,而P1组则有所降低。因此,P1组表现出的视觉保留可能是以对听觉线索的高度熟练定向为代价的。总体而言,这些结果扩展了我们的认知,表明除了P1猫之外,1月龄时发生17区和18区损伤的猫也表现出视觉引导定向的保留,并且这种保留不限于单一刺激范式。最后,P1和P28猫中通路改变程度与定向熟练程度规模之间的协变有助于巩固重新布线的脑通路与保留的视觉引导行为之间的联系。