• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与年龄匹配的对照组相比,患有早期精神病的年轻人的社交网络的数量和质量。

The quantity and quality of the social networks of young people with early psychosis compared with closely matched controls.

作者信息

Macdonald E M, Hayes R L, Baglioni A J

机构信息

School of Occupational Therapy, La Trobe University, Victoria 3083, Bundoora, Australia.

出版信息

Schizophr Res. 2000 Nov 30;46(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(00)00024-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0920-9964(00)00024-4
PMID:11099882
Abstract

This study compares the social networks and perceived social support of 26 people with early psychosis and 26 people without a mental illness. The two groups were closely matched for age, sex, education level, and employment and relationship status, and had equivalent levels of depression. There were no differences between the two groups in the amount of perceived social support, number of family members, and number of participants with acquaintances. However, the psychosis group identified significantly smaller networks, t (50)=-2.34, P=0.024, with fewer friends, t (48)=-3.61, P=0.001, fewer people to turn to in a crisis, t (22.97)=-2.34, P=0.028, and a higher likelihood of service providers as members, chi(2)(1)=7.02, P=0.008. Given the important relationship between strong social networks and high levels of community functioning and tenure, future research needs to evaluate the type of social support most beneficial for people with early psychosis and to develop strategies to maintain and facilitate that support.

摘要

本研究比较了26名早期精神病患者和26名无精神疾病者的社交网络及感知到的社会支持。两组在年龄、性别、教育水平、就业及恋爱状况方面进行了严格匹配,且抑郁水平相当。两组在感知到的社会支持量、家庭成员数量及有熟人的参与者数量方面没有差异。然而,精神病组确定的社交网络明显更小,t(50)= -2.34,P = 0.024,朋友更少,t(48)= -3.61,P = 0.001,危机中可求助的人更少,t(22.97)= -2.34,P = 0.028,且服务提供者作为成员的可能性更高,卡方(2)(1)= 7.02,P = 0.008。鉴于强大的社交网络与高水平的社区功能及居住期限之间的重要关系,未来研究需要评估对早期精神病患者最有益的社会支持类型,并制定维持和促进这种支持的策略。

相似文献

1
The quantity and quality of the social networks of young people with early psychosis compared with closely matched controls.与年龄匹配的对照组相比,患有早期精神病的年轻人的社交网络的数量和质量。
Schizophr Res. 2000 Nov 30;46(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(00)00024-4.
2
[What support of young presenting a first psychotic episode, when schooling is being challenged?].当学业受到挑战时,对于首次出现精神病发作的年轻人有哪些支持措施?
Encephale. 2017 Dec;43(6):570-576. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
3
The relationship between social networks and occupational and self-care functioning in people with psychosis.精神病患者社交网络与职业及自我照料功能之间的关系。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003 Apr;38(4):180-8. doi: 10.1007/s00127-003-0617-4.
4
Understanding the social costs of psychosis: the experience of adults affected by psychosis identified within the second Australian National Survey of Psychosis.理解精神病的社会成本:在第二次澳大利亚全国精神病学调查中发现的受精神病影响的成年人的体验。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;46(9):879-89. doi: 10.1177/0004867412449060. Epub 2012 May 29.
5
The influence of gender on clinical and social characteristics of patients at psychosis onset: A report from the Psychosis Incident Cohort Outcome Study (PICOS).性别对精神病发病患者临床和社会特征的影响:来自精神病发病队列研究(PICOS)的报告。
Psychol Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):769-80. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001991.
6
Predicting community survival in early psychosis and schizophrenia populations after receiving intensive case management.预测早期精神病和精神分裂症患者在接受强化个案管理后的社区生存情况。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2000 Feb;34(1):122-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2000.00697.x.
7
Social relationships in young adults at ultra high risk for psychosis.处于超高精神疾病风险的年轻人的社会关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Jan;247:345-351. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
8
Predictors of change in social networks, support and satisfaction following a first episode psychosis: A cohort study.首发精神病后社会网络、支持和满意度变化的预测因素:一项队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Nov;76:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
9
Childhood adversities: Social support, premorbid functioning and social outcome in first-episode psychosis and a matched case-control group.童年逆境:首发精神病患者及匹配的病例对照组中的社会支持、病前功能和社会结局
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;50(8):770-82. doi: 10.1177/0004867415625814. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
10
Does assertive community outreach improve social support? Results from the Lambeth Study of early-episode psychosis.积极社区外展是否能改善社会支持?来自拉姆贝斯早期精神病发作研究的结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Mar;63(3):216-22. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20110013.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognition as a predictor of social network size and early communication in clinically high risk for psychosis individuals.认知作为精神病临床高危个体社交网络规模和早期沟通的预测指标。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 May 8;41:100365. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100365. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Exploring like-attracts-like friendships in diagnosed and self-diagnosed populations: a description of 2 systematic reviews.探索确诊和自我诊断人群中同类相吸的友谊:两项系统评价的描述
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02884-6.
3
Social networks of people with serious mental illness who smoke: potential role in a smoking cessation intervention.
吸烟的严重精神疾病患者的社交网络:戒烟干预中的潜在作用。
J Ment Health. 2024 Dec;33(6):739-748. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2024.2332807. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
4
Intensive Longitudinal Social Sensing in Patients With Psychosis Spectrum Disorders: An Exploratory Pilot Study.精神病谱系障碍患者的密集纵向社会感知:一项探索性试点研究。
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Dec 20;51(1):236-246. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae032.
5
The mediating role of social connectedness and hope in the relationship between group membership continuity and mental health problems in vulnerable young people.社会联结与希望在弱势群体中群体成员身份连续性与心理健康问题关系中的中介作用。
BJPsych Open. 2023 Jul 19;9(4):e130. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.500.
6
AI-based chatbots in conversational commerce and their effects on product and price perceptions.对话式商务中基于人工智能的聊天机器人及其对产品和价格认知的影响。
Electron Mark. 2023;33(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s12525-023-00633-8. Epub 2023 May 24.
7
Social network size in adolescents at clinical high risk for psychosis.青少年精神病高危人群的社交网络规模。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2023 May;17(5):462-469. doi: 10.1111/eip.13341. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
8
Quirky conversations: how people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia do dialogue differently.古怪的对话:精神分裂症患者的对话方式有何不同。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 24;378(1875):20210480. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0480. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
9
How social information impacts action in rodents and humans: the role of the prefrontal cortex and its connections.社会信息如何影响啮齿动物和人类的行为:前额叶皮层及其连接的作用。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Apr;147:105075. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105075. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
10
Social Dysfunction in Psychosis Is More Than a Matter of Misperception: Advances From the Study of Metacognition.精神病中的社会功能障碍不仅仅是认知错误的问题:元认知研究的进展
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 14;12:723952. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723952. eCollection 2021.