Lin C S, Mogyoros I, Kuwabara S, Cappelen-Smith C, Burke D
Department of Neurology, The Prince of Wales Hospital, and Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
J Physiol. 2000 Dec 1;529 Pt 2(Pt 2):483-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00483.x.
To determine whether accommodation to depolarizing and hyperpolarizing stimuli differs for cutaneous afferents in the median and sural nerves, studies were performed in normal human subjects using threshold electrotonus. The changes in threshold for compound sensory action potentials of 50 % of maximum were recorded when the nerves were subjected to long-lasting depolarizing and hyperpolarizing DC. The premise was that the threshold changes largely mirror the underlying electrotonic changes in membrane potential. The maximal threshold changes produced by depolarizing and hyperpolarizing currents were greater for median afferents, suggesting that the DC produced greater changes in membrane potential in these afferents. Median afferents underwent greater accommodation to depolarizing currents than sural afferents and a greater threshold undershoot at the end of the currents, suggesting greater activity of a slow K+ conductance. Median afferents also underwent greater accommodation to hyperpolarizing currents, suggesting greater inward rectification. These conductances are voltage dependent, and the differences in accommodation could be due to greater changes in membrane potential for the median nerve. The changes in threshold produced by long-lasting depolarizing and hyperpolarizing currents of graded intensity were therefore measured. When the threshold changes were matched for the two nerves, median afferents underwent 22.4 % more accommodation to depolarizing currents and 28.7 % more accommodation to hyperpolarizing currents. We conclude that there is greater expression of two internodally located conductances responsible for accommodation on median afferents. The biophysical differences identified in this study might contribute to the finding that sural afferents have a greater tendency to dysfunction than median afferents.
为了确定正中神经和腓肠神经中皮肤传入神经对去极化和超极化刺激的适应性是否存在差异,我们使用阈下电紧张技术对正常人类受试者进行了研究。当神经受到持续的去极化和超极化直流电刺激时,记录复合感觉动作电位阈值达到最大值50%时的变化。前提是阈值变化在很大程度上反映了膜电位潜在的电紧张变化。去极化和超极化电流产生的最大阈值变化在正中神经传入神经中更大,这表明直流电在这些传入神经中引起了更大的膜电位变化。正中神经传入神经对去极化电流的适应性比腓肠神经传入神经更强,并且在电流结束时阈值下冲更大,这表明慢钾电导的活性更高。正中神经传入神经对超极化电流的适应性也更强,这表明内向整流作用更强。这些电导是电压依赖性的,适应性的差异可能是由于正中神经的膜电位变化更大。因此,我们测量了不同强度的持续去极化和超极化电流所引起的阈值变化。当两条神经的阈值变化相匹配时,正中神经传入神经对去极化电流的适应性增加了22.4%,对超极化电流的适应性增加了28.7%。我们得出结论,在正中神经传入神经上,负责适应性的两种节间电导有更高的表达。本研究中确定的生物物理差异可能有助于解释腓肠神经传入神经比正中神经传入神经更容易出现功能障碍这一现象。