Grazier K L, Pollack H
University of Michigan, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57 Suppl 2:53-71. doi: 10.1177/1077558700057002S04.
This article uses a 4-pronged statistical approach to examine the impact of a mental health carve-out at a major employer. To examine net financial impact of the carve-out, the authors perform a pre-post, multivariate regression analysis of changes in costs. Using a random-effects model, the authors explore the ultimate financial impact of the carve-out for patients and for the firm. Using a multinomial logistic regression, they examine differing program effects by intensity of use. A fixed-effects negative binomial regression models the episodic nature of outpatient care, controlling for patient-specific unobserved characteristics that influence health care utilization. The carve-out slightly reduced overall mental health costs and utilization while expanding entry-level access to routine services. At the same time, the specific carve-out shifted financial burdens from the firm onto high-utilization patients. Therefore, this carve-out appears poorly suited to the care of individuals experiencing severe and debilitating psychiatric disorders.
本文采用了一种四管齐下的统计方法,来研究一家大型雇主实施的心理健康独立核算方案的影响。为了检验该独立核算方案的净财务影响,作者对成本变化进行了前后对比的多元回归分析。作者使用随机效应模型,探究了该独立核算方案对患者和公司的最终财务影响。他们使用多项逻辑回归,按使用强度来检验不同的项目效果。固定效应负二项回归对门诊护理的阶段性性质进行建模,同时控制影响医疗保健利用情况的患者特定未观察特征。该独立核算方案在略微降低总体心理健康成本和利用率的同时,扩大了初级常规服务的可及性。与此同时,该特定独立核算方案将财务负担从公司转移到了高利用率患者身上。因此,这种独立核算方案似乎不太适合照顾患有严重且使人衰弱的精神疾病的患者。