• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为患有精神疾病的街头流浪者提供服务:一项精神康复临床试验的结果

Serving street-dwelling individuals with psychiatric disabilities: outcomes of a psychiatric rehabilitation clinical trial.

作者信息

Shern D L, Tsemberis S, Anthony W, Lovell A M, Richmond L, Felton C J, Winarski J, Cohen M

机构信息

New York State Office of Mental Health, Albany, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2000 Dec;90(12):1873-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.12.1873.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.90.12.1873
PMID:11111259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1446423/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study tested a psychiatric rehabilitation approach for organizing and delivering services to street-dwelling persons with severe mental illness.

METHODS

Street-dwelling persons with severe mental illness were randomly assigned to the experimental program (called Choices) or to standard treatment in New York City. We assessed study participants at baseline and at 6-month intervals over 24 months, using measures of service use, quality of life, health, mental health, and social psychological status. The average deviation from baseline summary statistic was employed to assess change.

RESULTS

Compared with persons in standard treatment (n = 77), members of the experimental group (n = 91) were more likely to attend a day program (53% vs 27%), had less difficulty in meeting their basic needs, spent less time on the streets (55% vs 28% reduction), and spent more time in community housing (21% vs 9% increase). They showed greater improvement in life satisfaction and experienced a greater reduction in psychiatric symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

With an appropriate service model, it is possible to engage disaffiliated populations, expand their use of human services, and improve their housing conditions, quality of life, and mental health status.

摘要

目的

本研究测试了一种精神康复方法,用于为街头流浪的重度精神疾病患者组织和提供服务。

方法

将街头流浪的重度精神疾病患者随机分配到实验项目(称为“选择”)或纽约市的标准治疗组。我们在基线时以及在24个月内每隔6个月对研究参与者进行评估,使用服务利用、生活质量、健康、心理健康和社会心理状态等指标。采用与基线汇总统计量的平均偏差来评估变化。

结果

与接受标准治疗的患者(n = 77)相比,实验组的成员(n = 91)更有可能参加日间项目(53%对27%),满足基本需求的困难更小,在街上花费的时间更少(减少55%对28%),在社区住房中花费的时间更多(增加21%对9%)。他们在生活满意度方面有更大改善,精神症状减少得更多。

结论

采用适当的服务模式,有可能让脱离社会的人群参与进来,扩大他们对人类服务的利用,并改善他们的住房条件、生活质量和心理健康状况。

相似文献

1
Serving street-dwelling individuals with psychiatric disabilities: outcomes of a psychiatric rehabilitation clinical trial.为患有精神疾病的街头流浪者提供服务:一项精神康复临床试验的结果
Am J Public Health. 2000 Dec;90(12):1873-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.12.1873.
2
Street outreach for homeless persons with serious mental illness: is it effective?针对患有严重精神疾病的无家可归者的街头外展服务:它有效吗?
Med Care. 1999 Sep;37(9):894-907. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199909000-00006.
3
Long-term effects of rent supplements and mental health support services on housing and health outcomes of homeless adults with mental illness: extension study of the At Home/Chez Soi randomised controlled trial.租金补贴和心理健康支持服务对患有精神疾病的无家可归成年人住房和健康状况的长期影响:“在家/在自己家”随机对照试验的扩展研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;6(11):915-925. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30371-2. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
4
Pathways to housing: supported housing for street-dwelling homeless individuals with psychiatric disabilities.住房安置途径:为患有精神疾病的街头流浪无家可归者提供支持性住房。
Psychiatr Serv. 2000 Apr;51(4):487-93. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.51.4.487.
5
Taking it to the street: a psychiatric outreach service in Canada.走向街头:加拿大的一项精神科外展服务
Community Ment Health J. 2005 Dec;41(6):737-46. doi: 10.1007/s10597-005-6430-7.
6
A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of Housing First in a small Canadian City.在加拿大一个小城市进行的“先住后付”有效性的随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):1154. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7492-8.
7
Decreasing psychiatric symptoms by increasing choice in services for adults with histories of homelessness.通过增加为有过无家可归经历的成年人提供的服务选择来减轻精神症状。
Am J Community Psychol. 2005 Dec;36(3-4):223-38. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-8617-z.
8
A randomized trial of assertive community treatment for homeless persons with severe mental illness.针对患有严重精神疾病的无家可归者的积极社区治疗随机试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Nov;54(11):1038-43. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830230076011.
9
Effect of full-service partnerships on homelessness, use and costs of mental health services, and quality of life among adults with serious mental illness.全方位服务伙伴关系对严重精神疾病成年患者的无家可归状况、心理健康服务的使用与成本以及生活质量的影响。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;67(6):645-52. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.56.
10
Consumer preference programs for individuals who are homeless and have psychiatric disabilities: a drop-in center and a supported housing program.针对无家可归且患有精神疾病的个人的消费者偏好项目:一个日间服务中心和一个支持性住房项目。
Am J Community Psychol. 2003 Dec;32(3-4):305-17. doi: 10.1023/b:ajcp.0000004750.66957.bf.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeted interventions to improve the social and economic circumstances of people with mental ill-health from marginalised communities: a systematic review.改善边缘化社区心理健康状况不佳者社会经济状况的针对性干预措施:一项系统综述
Psychol Med. 2025 Jul 28;55:e217. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725101128.
2
The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for reducing problematic substance use, mental ill health, and housing instability in people experiencing homelessness in high income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高收入国家中针对无家可归者减少有害药物使用、心理健康问题及住房不稳定状况的社会心理干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 17;21(1):e70019. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70019. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Exploring the effect of case management in homelessness per components: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation, with meta-analysis and thematic synthesis.按组成部分探究个案管理在解决无家可归问题中的效果:一项关于有效性与实施情况的系统评价,并进行荟萃分析和主题综合分析。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 May 17;19(2):e1329. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1329. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Accommodation-based interventions for individuals experiencing, or at risk of experiencing, homelessness.针对正在经历或有经历无家可归风险的个人的基于住宿的干预措施。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 18;17(2):e1165. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1165. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
A comprehensive review of prioritised interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of persons with lived experience of homelessness.对改善有过无家可归经历者的健康和福祉的优先干预措施的全面综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 24;17(2):e1154. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1154. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Effectiveness of interventions to reduce homelessness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.减少无家可归现象干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 28;14(1):1-281. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.3. eCollection 2018.
7
Racial Health Equity and Social Needs Interventions: A Review of a Scoping Review.种族健康公平与社会需求干预:一项系统评价综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250654. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50654.
8
Beyond Supported Housing: Correlates of Improvements in Quality of Life Among Homeless Adults with Mental Illness.超越支持性住房:改善患有精神疾病的无家可归成年人生活质量的相关因素。
Psychiatr Q. 2023 Mar;94(1):49-59. doi: 10.1007/s11126-022-10010-x. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
9
Does Street Outreach Engage Its Intended Target Population? Clinical Experience in the Veteran's Health Administration Homeless Service Programs.街头外展服务是否覆盖了其预定目标人群?退伍军人健康管理局无家可归者服务项目的临床经验。
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Dec;93(4):1003-1016. doi: 10.1007/s11126-022-10004-9. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
10
Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of the Boston University Approach to Psychiatric Rehabilitation for Increasing the Social Participation of Individuals With Severe Mental Illnesses.波士顿大学精神疾病康复方法对提高重度精神疾病患者社会参与度的成本效益及预算影响
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 26;13:880482. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.880482. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Sample size calculations based on slopes and other summary statistics.基于斜率和其他汇总统计量的样本量计算。
Biometrics. 1998 Mar;54(1):323-30.
2
Models of community care for severe mental illness: a review of research on case management.严重精神疾病的社区护理模式:病例管理研究综述
Schizophr Bull. 1998;24(1):37-74. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033314.
3
Housing outcomes for homeless adults with mental illness: results from the second-round McKinney program.患有精神疾病的无家可归成年人的住房状况:第二轮麦金尼计划的结果
Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Feb;48(2):239-41. doi: 10.1176/ps.48.2.239.
4
Consumers as peer specialists on intensive case management teams: impact on client outcomes.作为强化个案管理团队中同伴专家的消费者:对客户结果的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Oct;46(10):1037-44. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.10.1037.
5
Outreach to homeless mentally ill people: conceptual and clinical considerations.对无家可归的精神病患者的 outreach:概念和临床考量。 (注:这里“outreach”直译为“外展”,在医学领域可理解为针对特定群体开展的拓展性服务等意思,但具体含义需结合上下文确定,这里暂保留英文以便准确传达原文的不确定性)
Community Ment Health J. 1996 Jun;32(3):261-74. doi: 10.1007/BF02249427.
6
Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data. Application to the NIMH treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program dataset.纵向精神病学数据分析中的一些概念和统计问题。应用于美国国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症治疗协作研究项目数据集。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Sep;50(9):739-50. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820210073009.
7
Client outcomes II: Longitudinal client data from the Colorado treatment outcome study.客户成果二:来自科罗拉多治疗成果研究的纵向客户数据。
Milbank Q. 1994;72(1):123-48.
8
Size and power of two-sample tests of repeated measures data.重复测量数据的两样本检验的规模与功效
Biometrics. 1993 Dec;49(4):1022-32.
9
Interpreting research on the homeless mentally ill: some caveats.解读关于无家可归的精神病患者的研究:一些注意事项。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1984 Sep;35(9):914-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.35.9.914.
10
National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity.美国国立精神卫生研究所诊断访谈表。其历史、特点及效度。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981 Apr;38(4):381-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001.