• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险和终末期肾病项目中的处方药。

Prescription drugs in Medicare and the ESRD program.

作者信息

Powe N R

机构信息

Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research and the Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Semin Nephrol. 2000 Nov;20(6):535-42.

PMID:11111855
Abstract

Prescription drugs have improved the length and quality of life for many persons, particularly those with chronic disease. However, their contribution to total health care costs has been increasing, making it difficult for patients to afford necessary medications. Current Medicare policy, derived from statutory enactments by Congress, precludes payment for prescription medications with the exception a few medications for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. A more comprehensive prescription drug benefit for Medicare has been proposed that might benefit ESRD patients. Design and implementation of a medication drug benefit involves several issues including what medications should be covered, under what circumstances, how cost should be shared, the payment structure, level of payment, and management of the benefit. This report describes the experience with Medicare coverage of prescription drugs for ESRD patients and explores issues in offering a general medication insurance benefit under Medicare.

摘要

处方药改善了许多人的寿命和生活质量,尤其是那些患有慢性病的人。然而,它们在总体医疗保健成本中所占的比例一直在增加,这使得患者难以负担必要的药物。目前源自国会立法的医疗保险政策,除了为终末期肾病(ESRD)患者提供的少数几种药物外,不包括处方药的费用。有人提议为医疗保险提供更全面的处方药福利,这可能会使ESRD患者受益。处方药福利的设计和实施涉及几个问题,包括应涵盖哪些药物、在何种情况下、成本应如何分担、支付结构、支付水平以及福利管理。本报告描述了医疗保险为ESRD患者提供处方药覆盖的经验,并探讨了在医疗保险下提供一般药物保险福利的相关问题。

相似文献

1
Prescription drugs in Medicare and the ESRD program.医疗保险和终末期肾病项目中的处方药。
Semin Nephrol. 2000 Nov;20(6):535-42.
2
Falling into the doughnut hole: drug spending among beneficiaries with end-stage renal disease under Medicare Part D plans.陷入“甜甜圈洞”:医疗保险D部分计划下终末期肾病受益人的药品支出
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Sep;17(9):2546-53. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005121385. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
3
Lessons for Medicare Part D in the hemodialysis community.血液透析领域给医疗保险D部分的经验教训。
BMC Nephrol. 2006 Jul 6;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-7-11.
4
Potential impact of Medicare Part D in the end-stage renal disease population.医疗保险D部分对终末期肾病患者群体的潜在影响。
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2008 Apr;15(2):140-6. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2008.01.014.
5
Medicare program; Medicare prescription drug benefit. Final rule.医疗保险计划;医疗保险处方药福利。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2005 Jan 28;70(18):4193-585.
6
Medicare program; Medicare prescription drug discount card. Interim final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;医疗保险处方药折扣卡。有意见征求期的暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2003 Dec 15;68(240):69839-927.
7
Potential effects of the new Medicare Prospective Payment System on drug prescription in end-stage renal disease care.新的医疗保险按预期支付制度对终末期肾病治疗中药物处方的潜在影响。
Blood Purif. 2011;31(1-3):66-9. doi: 10.1159/000321856. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
8
Medicare-approved drug discount cards and renal transplant patients: how much can these cards reduce prescription costs?医疗保险批准的药品折扣卡与肾移植患者:这些卡能降低多少处方药费用?
Clin Transplant. 2005 Jun;19(3):357-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00349.x.
9
Impact of prescription coverage on hospital and physician costs: a case study of medicare beneficiaries with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.处方保险对医院和医生成本的影响:以患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病的医疗保险受益人为例的研究
Clin Ther. 2004 Oct;26(10):1688-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.10.012.
10
Pharmaceuticals: Medicare Modernization Act--2005. End of Year Issue Brief.药品:《医疗保险现代化法案》——2005年。年终问题简报。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2005 Dec 31:1-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients, populations and policy: patient outcomes in chronic kidney disease.患者、人群与政策:慢性肾脏病的患者结局
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2001;112:224-32; discussion 232-4.