The role of three-dimensional information in health care and medical education: the implications for anatomy and dissection.

The purposes of medical education can be summarized as learning how to take an effective history, perform a physical examination, and perform diagnostic and therapeutic procedures with minimal risk and maximal benefit to patients. Because patients are three-dimensional (3-D) objects, health care and medical education involve learning and applying 3-D information. The foundation begins in anatomy where students form and confirm or reform their own 3-D ideas and images of the development and structure of the human body at all levels of organization. Students go on to understand the interdependence of structure and function in health and disease. The basic questions for those teaching anatomy are "How do we learn and use 3-D information?" and "How is it taught most effectively?" These are not easy questions for teachers and are rarely asked by those who currently defend or reframe curricula. Unfortunately, there is little information on how we learn 3-D information and no evidence-based literature on the relative long-term vocational effectiveness of methods for teaching it. It is clear that we learn in several distinct modalities and that our students represent a spectrum of learning styles. To support the 3-D learning essential to both medical education and health care, anatomical societies need to provide answers to the following questions: Do the opportunities of dissection (visual, tactile, time, discovery, group process, mentoring) contribute to short- and long-term learning of 3-D information? If so, how? Does dissection offer significant advantages over other methods for learning, confirming, and using 3-D information in anatomy? Answers to these questions will provide a rational basis for decisions about curricular changes in anatomy courses (if, where, and when dissection should occur). This, in turn, will link these changes to society's ultimate purposes for medical education and health care rather than to the fiscal concerns of the businesses of health care and medical education, which is the current practice.