Coull J, Weir P L, Tremblay L, Weeks D J, Elliott D
Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.
J Mot Behav. 2000 Dec;32(4):347-60. doi: 10.1080/00222890009601385.
In the present research the authors examined the time course of binocular integration in goal-directed aiming and grasping. With liquid-crystal goggles, the authors manipulated vision independently to the right and left eyes of 10 students during movement preparation and movement execution. Contrary to earlier findings reported in catching experiments (I. Olivier, D. J. Weeks, K. L. Ricker, J. Lyons, & D. Elliott, 1998), neither a temporal nor a spatial binocular advantage was obtained in 1 grasping and 2 aiming studies. That result suggests that, at least in some circumstances, monocular vision is sufficient for the precise control of limb movements. In a final aiming experiment involving 3-dimensional spatial variability and no trial-to-trial visual feedback about performance, binocular vision was associated with greater spatial accuracy. Binocular superiority appeared to be most pronounced when participants were unable to adjust their limb control strategy or procedure on the basis of terminal feedback about performance.
在本研究中,作者考察了目标导向的瞄准和抓握过程中双眼整合的时间进程。作者使用液晶护目镜,在10名学生的动作准备和动作执行过程中,分别独立控制他们左右眼的视觉。与先前在接球实验中报告的结果(I. 奥利维尔、D. J. 威克斯、K. L. 里克、J. 莱昂斯和D. 埃利奥特,1998年)相反,在1项抓握研究和2项瞄准研究中,均未获得时间上或空间上的双眼优势。该结果表明,至少在某些情况下,单眼视觉足以精确控制肢体动作。在最后一项涉及三维空间变异性且没有关于表现的逐次视觉反馈的瞄准实验中,双眼视觉与更高的空间准确性相关。当参与者无法根据关于表现的最终反馈来调整其肢体控制策略或程序时,双眼优势似乎最为明显。