Chizh B A, Reissmüller E, Schlütz H, Scheede M, Haase G, Englberger W
Grünenthal GmbH Research and Development, Zieglerstrasse 6, D-52078 Aachen, Germany.
Neuropharmacology. 2001;40(2):212-20. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(00)00148-9.
The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist ifenprodil and several structurally related compounds are highly selective for the NR2B-containing receptor subtype. This selectivity could provide an explanation for the reported difference of the analgesic and side-effect profile of ifenprodil-like compounds from other NMDA antagonists. In this work, we have queried if the ifenprodil-induced antinociception can be attributed to the block of NMDA receptors in the spinal cord. Ifenprodil and some other NMDA antagonists (MK-801, memantine) were tested in a model of inflammatory pain (Randall-Selitto) in rats. The in vivo NMDA antagonism was assessed in anaesthetised rats on responses of spinal dorsal horn (DH) neurones to iontophoretic NMDA and in the model of single motor unit (SMU) wind-up. Ifenprodil, MK-801 and memantine dose-dependently increased nociceptive thresholds in the Randall-Selitto model. Antinociceptive doses of the channel blockers selectively antagonised NMDA responses of DH neurones and inhibited wind-up. In contrast, antinociceptive doses of ifenprodil did not show any NMDA antagonism in electrophysiological tests. Although ifenprodil did not inhibit the SMU responses to noxious stimuli in spinalised rats, it markedly and dose-dependently inhibited nociceptive SMU responses in sham-spinalised rats. These results argue against the spinal cord being the principal site of antinociceptive action of ifenprodil; supraspinal structures seem to be involved in this effect.
N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)拮抗剂艾芬地尔及几种结构相关化合物对含NR2B的受体亚型具有高度选择性。这种选择性可以解释为何艾芬地尔样化合物与其他NMDA拮抗剂在镇痛和副作用方面存在差异。在本研究中,我们探究了艾芬地尔诱导的抗伤害感受作用是否可归因于脊髓中NMDA受体的阻断。在大鼠炎症性疼痛模型(兰德尔-塞利托模型)中对艾芬地尔及其他一些NMDA拮抗剂(MK-801、美金刚)进行了测试。在麻醉大鼠身上,通过观察脊髓背角(DH)神经元对离子导入NMDA的反应以及在单运动单位(SMU)后放电模型中评估体内NMDA拮抗作用。在兰德尔-塞利托模型中,艾芬地尔、MK-801和美金刚剂量依赖性地提高了伤害感受阈值。通道阻滞剂的抗伤害感受剂量选择性地拮抗了DH神经元的NMDA反应并抑制了后放电。相比之下,在电生理测试中,艾芬地尔的抗伤害感受剂量未显示出任何NMDA拮抗作用。尽管艾芬地尔并未抑制脊髓损伤大鼠中SMU对伤害性刺激的反应,但它在假脊髓损伤大鼠中显著且剂量依赖性地抑制了伤害性SMU反应。这些结果表明脊髓并非艾芬地尔抗伤害感受作用的主要部位;脊髓上结构似乎参与了这一效应。