Spoth R L, Redmond C, Shin C
Institute for Social and Behavioral Research, ISU Research Park, Building 2, 2625 North Loop Drive, Suite 500, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010-8296, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Dec;154(12):1248-57. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.12.1248.
To examine the long-term effects of a brief family intervention on aggressive and hostile behaviors of adolescents in the general population.
Randomized trial including 22 public schools assigned to the Iowa Strengthening Families Program or a control condition. Analyses supported sample representativeness and failed to show differential attrition effects 4 years after baseline.
Seven-session intervention for parents and their sixth-grade children.
The multi-informant, multimethod measures included independent observer ratings of adolescent aggressive and hostile behaviors in adolescent-parent interactions, family-member report of aggressive and hostile behaviors in those interactions, and adolescent self-report of aggressive and destructive conduct across settings. Data were collected during the 6th (preintervention and postintervention), 7th, 8th, and 10th grades.
All measures showed a generally positive trend in intervention-control group differences over time. During 10th grade, significant intervention-control differences were found for adolescent self-report of aggressive and destructive conduct (P =. 01), with relative reduction rates ranging from 31.7% to 77.0%. Significant differences were shown for observer-rated aggressive and hostile behaviors in adolescent-parent interactions (P =.01); differences in family member reports of those behaviors were not significant. Supplemental analyses of both interactional behavior measures, specific to parent sex, indicated significant experimental group differences in interactions with mothers (P =.04 for both measures) but not with fathers.
Brief family competency-training interventions designed for general populations can reduce aggressive and hostile behaviors in adolescents' interactions with parents and adolescent aggressive behaviors outside of the home setting. Thus, this type of intervention has important public health implications. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:1248-1257.
探讨一项简短家庭干预对普通人群中青少年攻击性行为和敌对行为的长期影响。
随机试验,包括22所公立学校,被分配到爱荷华州强化家庭计划或对照条件。分析支持样本代表性,且未显示基线后4年的差异损耗效应。
为父母及其六年级孩子开展的为期七节的干预。
多信息提供者、多方法测量包括独立观察者对青少年与父母互动中攻击性行为和敌对行为的评分、家庭成员对这些互动中攻击性行为和敌对行为的报告,以及青少年对不同场景下攻击性行为和破坏性行为的自我报告。在六年级(干预前和干预后)、七年级、八年级和十年级收集数据。
随着时间推移,所有测量指标在干预组与对照组差异方面总体呈现积极趋势。在十年级时,青少年对攻击性行为和破坏性行为的自我报告存在显著的干预组与对照组差异(P = 0.01),相对降低率在31.7%至77.0%之间。青少年与父母互动中观察者评定的攻击性行为和敌对行为存在显著差异(P = 0.01);家庭成员对这些行为的报告差异不显著。对两种互动行为测量指标按父母性别进行的补充分析表明,实验组与母亲互动存在显著差异(两种测量指标P均 = 0.04),但与父亲互动无显著差异。
为普通人群设计的简短家庭能力培训干预可减少青少年与父母互动中的攻击性行为和敌对行为以及家庭外环境中的青少年攻击性行为。因此,这类干预具有重要的公共卫生意义。《儿科学与青少年医学档案》。2000年;154:1248 - 1257。