Pereira Gomes J C, Pedreira W L, Araújo E M, Soriano F G, Negri E M, Antonângelo L, Tadeu Velasco I
Emergency, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Chest. 2000 Dec;118(6):1739-46. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.6.1739.
Pneumonia is responsible for 50% of antibiotics prescribed in ICUs. Treatment failure, ie, absence of improvement or clinical deterioration under antibiotic therapy, presents a dilemma to physicians. BAL is an invasive method validated for etiologic diagnosis in pneumonia.
To evaluate in ICU patients the impact of BAL in the etiologic diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of pneumonia with treatment failure.
Prospective clinical study.
Nonsurgical, medical ICU of a university hospital in Brazil.
Sixty-two episodes of pneumonia treated for at least 72 h without clinical improvement in 53 patients hospitalized for diverse clinical emergencies. Mean duration of hospitalization was 14.2 days. Mean duration of previous antibiotic therapy was 11.4 days.
Bronchoscopy and BAL were performed in each episode. BAL fluid was cultivated for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria; the cutoff considered positive was 10(4) cfu/mL; 10(3) cfu/mL was also analyzed if under treatment. Pneumocystis carinii, fungi, Legionella spp, and Mycobacterium spp were also researched.
Fifty-eight of 62 BAL were performed under antibiotics. The results showed positivity in 45 of 62 (72.6%); 42 of the 45 positive episodes (93.3%) had > 10(4) cfu/mL. The three cases with between 10(3) and 10(4) cfu/mL were considered positive and were treated according to BAL cultures. The main agents were Acinetobacter baumannii (37.1%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.7%), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; 16.1%); 46.7% of the episodes (21 of 45) were polymicrobial. BAL results directed a change of therapy in 34 episodes (54.8%). Overall mortality was 43.5%. There was no difference in mortality among positives, negatives, and patients who changed therapy guided by BAL culture.
(1) BAL fluid examination was positive in 45 of 62 episodes (72.6%), with 58 of 62 BAL performed under antibiotics. This suggests that BAL may be a sensitive diagnostic method for treatment failures of clinically diagnosed pneumonias, even if performed under antibiotics; (2) the main pathogens in our study were A baumannii, P aeruginosa, and MRSA, and approximately 45% of infections were polymicrobial; (3) BAL culture results directed a change of therapy in 75.6% of positive episodes (34 of 45) and in 54.8% of all episodes of treatment failure (34 of 62); and (4) there was no difference in mortality among positives, negatives, and patients who changed therapy guided by BAL culture.
在重症监护病房(ICU)中,50%的抗生素处方用于治疗肺炎。治疗失败,即在抗生素治疗下病情无改善或临床恶化,给医生带来了难题。支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)是一种经证实可用于肺炎病因诊断的侵入性方法。
评估在ICU患者中,BAL对治疗失败的肺炎的病因诊断、治疗及预后的影响。
前瞻性临床研究。
巴西一家大学医院的非手术内科ICU。
53名因各种临床急症住院的患者中发生了62例肺炎,治疗至少72小时后临床无改善。平均住院时间为14.2天。先前抗生素治疗的平均持续时间为11.4天。
对每例患者进行支气管镜检查和BAL。对BAL液进行需氧菌和厌氧菌培养;判定为阳性的临界值为10⁴cfu/mL;治疗期间若低于该值,则分析10³cfu/mL的情况。同时还检测卡氏肺孢子虫、真菌、军团菌属和分枝杆菌属。
62例BAL中有58例是在使用抗生素的情况下进行的。结果显示,62例中有45例(72.6%)呈阳性;45例阳性病例中有42例(93.3%)的菌落形成单位(cfu)>10⁴/mL。3例cfu在10³至10⁴/mL之间的病例被判定为阳性,并根据BAL培养结果进行治疗。主要病原体为鲍曼不动杆菌(37.1%)、铜绿假单胞菌(17.7%)和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA;16.1%);46.7%的病例(45例中的21例)为混合感染。BAL结果导致34例(54.8%)的治疗方案发生改变。总体死亡率为43.5%。阳性、阴性以及根据BAL培养结果改变治疗方案的患者之间的死亡率无差异。
(1)62例中有45例(72.6%)的BAL液检查呈阳性,62例BAL中有58例是在使用抗生素的情况下进行的。这表明BAL可能是临床诊断肺炎治疗失败的一种敏感诊断方法,即使是在使用抗生素的情况下进行;(2)我们研究中的主要病原体是鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和MRSA,约45%的感染为混合感染;(3)BAL培养结果使75.6%的阳性病例(45例中的34例)和54.8%的所有治疗失败病例(62例中的34例)的治疗方案发生改变;(4)阳性、阴性以及根据BAL培养结果改变治疗方案的患者之间的死亡率无差异。