• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜辅助子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的随机对照及经济学评价

A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.

作者信息

Lumsden M A, Twaddle S, Hawthorn R, Traynor I, Gilmore D, Davis J, Deeny M, Cameron I T, Walker J J

机构信息

Western Infirmary, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow.

出版信息

BJOG. 2000 Nov;107(11):1386-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11653.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11653.x
PMID:11117767
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety, cost effectiveness and effect on quality of life of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) compared with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in the management of benign gynaecological disease.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.

SETTING

Three hospitals in the West of Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred women scheduled for an abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Conversion rate of LAVH to TAH, complication rates, NHS resource use and costs, quality of life using EuroQol 5 D visual analogue scale, and achievement of milestones.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of operative complications was 14% in the TAH group and 8% in the LAVH group, with an 8% conversion rate. Length of operation was significantly greater in the women having LAVH at 81 +/- 30 min vs 47 +/- 16 min (P < 0.001). There was no difference in analgesic requirements between the groups although there was a significantly shorter hospital stay for those having LAVH. The rate of post-surgery recovery, satisfaction with operation and quality of life at four weeks post-operative were similar in the two groups of women. LAVH was significantly more expensive than TAH and remained more expensive for all but the most extreme scenario.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that despite the decreased length of hospital stay, LAVH is more expensive than TAH. In addition, recovery following operation and patient satisfaction were not affected by the route chosen. It is unlikely that LAVH represents an efficient use of NHS resources.

摘要

目的

确定在治疗良性妇科疾病时,与经腹全子宫切除术(TAH)相比,腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)的安全性、成本效益及对生活质量的影响。

设计

随机对照试验及经济学评估。

地点

苏格兰西部的三家医院。

参与者

200名计划因良性妇科疾病接受腹部子宫切除术的女性。

主要观察指标

LAVH转为TAH的转化率、并发症发生率、英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)资源使用及成本、使用欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol 5 D)视觉模拟量表评估的生活质量,以及各关键指标的达成情况。

结果

TAH组手术并发症的总体发生率为14%,LAVH组为8%,转化率为8%。LAVH组女性的手术时间明显更长,为81±30分钟,而TAH组为47±16分钟(P<0.001)。两组之间的镇痛需求无差异,不过LAVH组的住院时间明显更短。两组女性术后四周的恢复速度、对手术的满意度及生活质量相似。LAVH比TAH成本显著更高,除了最极端的情况外,在所有情况下都更昂贵。

结论

本研究表明,尽管LAVH组住院时间缩短,但比TAH成本更高。此外,手术恢复情况及患者满意度不受手术方式选择的影响。LAVH不太可能是NHS资源的有效利用方式。

相似文献

1
A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.腹腔镜辅助子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的随机对照及经济学评价
BJOG. 2000 Nov;107(11):1386-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11653.x.
2
Clinical and financial analyses of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的临床及财务分析
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994 Aug;1(4 Pt 1):357-61. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80801-1.
3
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy appears to be an alternative to total abdominal hysterectomy.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术似乎是全腹子宫切除术的一种替代方案。
J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994 Jun;4(3):185-90. doi: 10.1089/lps.1994.4.185.
4
Postoperative outcomes and quality of life following hysterectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) compared to laparoscopy in women with a non-prolapsed uterus and benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)与腹腔镜手术治疗非脱垂子宫和良性妇科疾病女性子宫切除术后的结局及生活质量:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jan;208:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.044. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
5
[COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASES AND LESIONS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM].腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与阴式子宫切除术治疗女性生殖系统良性疾病及病变的比较
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2016;55 Suppl 1 Pt 1:4-10.
6
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case control comparative study with total abdominal hysterectomy.
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994 Feb;1(2):116-21. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80773-x.
7
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and hospital charges.腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌:临床疗效与住院费用
Gynecol Oncol. 1999 Apr;73(1):5-11. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5311.
8
Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
9
Identifying the indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomised comparison with abdominal hysterectomy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids.确定腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的适应证:对有症状子宫肌瘤患者进行的一项前瞻性、与腹式子宫切除术的随机对照比较。
BJOG. 2000 May;107(5):620-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13303.x.
10
[Operative approaches, indications, and medical economics evaluation of 4180 cases of hysterectomy].[4180例子宫切除术的手术方式、适应证及医学经济学评价]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2003 Aug;25(4):406-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病的子宫切除术手术入路。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6.
2
Clinical Determinants of Vaginal and Abdominal Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions at the University Teaching Hospital, Yaounde-Cameroon.喀麦隆雅温得大学教学医院良性疾病行阴道和腹部子宫切除术的临床决定因素
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2019 Jul-Sep;9(3):1-7. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_900_19. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
3
How to train practising gynaecologists in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: protocol for the stepped-wedge IMAGINE trial.
如何培训腹腔镜全子宫切除术的执业妇科医生:IMAGINE 试验的阶梯式楔形方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e027155. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027155.
4
Costs and mortality rates of surgical approaches to hysterectomy in Brazil.巴西子宫切除术手术方式的成本和死亡率
Rev Saude Publica. 2018 Mar 12;52:25. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052000129.
5
Reporting and Analysis of Trial-Based Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.基于试验的成本效益评估在妇产科中的报告和分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Oct;35(10):1007-1033. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0531-3.
6
Economic and Survival Implications of Use of Electric Power Morcellation for Hysterectomy for Presumed Benign Gynecologic Disease.对于疑似良性妇科疾病行子宫切除术使用电动旋切器的经济及生存影响
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Oct 8;107(11). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv251. Print 2015 Nov.
7
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
8
Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy.选择子宫切除术的途径
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015 Jul;65(4):251-4. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0562-z. Epub 2014 May 24.
9
A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy and Vaginal Hysterectomy: Experience in a Tertiary Diabetes Care Hospital in Bangladesh.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与阴式子宫切除术的比较研究:孟加拉国一家三级糖尿病护理医院的经验
J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2011 Jul-Dec;2(2):79-84. doi: 10.4103/0974-1216.114078.
10
The cost-effectiveness of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to total abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage endometrial cancer.经腹腔镜全子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的成本效果比较。
BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 18;3(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001884. Print 2013.