Suppr超能文献

国际法医遗传学协会英语工作组1997年、1998年和1999年亲子鉴定研讨会报告。

A report of the 1997, 1998 and 1999 Paternity Testing Workshops of the English Speaking Working Group of the International Society for Forensic Genetics.

作者信息

Hallenberg C, Morling N

机构信息

Department of Forensic Genetics, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2001 Feb 1;116(1):23-33. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00351-0.

Abstract

We present the results of the 1997, 1998 and 1999 Paternity Testing Workshops of the English Speaking Working Group of the International Society for Forensic Genetics. The numbers of participating laboratories were 24 (1997), 31 (1998) and 32 (1999). In 1997, all laboratories drew the correct conclusion that the alleged father was the biological father of the child. In 1998, the alleged father was the biological brother of the child and all laboratories excluded him. The scenario in 1999 was a deficiency case consisting of mother, child and the parents of the alleged father and all but one laboratory drew the correct conclusion.The percentage of laboratories routinely performing variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) investigations using single locus probes (SLPs) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) decreased from 83% in 1997 to 66% in 1999. In the three workshops, more than 90% of the laboratories used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based systems. In 1999, 80% of the laboratories performing PCR, used commercially available short tandem repeat (STR) kits. Other commonly used systems were HLA and PolyMarker investigated with PCR. Conventional systems and RFLP investigations of VNTRs with multi loci probes (MLPs) were used routinely by approximately 20% of the participating laboratories. All laboratories submitting results in the three workshops used RFLP-based VNTRs or/and PCR based VNTRs/STRs. Inter-laboratory comparisons of the results showed a very high concordance. The overall coefficients of variation between the laboratories of the results of RFLP typing of the commonly used VNTRs D2S44, D7S21, D7S22 and D12S11 were 1.2-1.3%. Consistent results were obtained in the great majority of the systems investigated by PCR and typing errors counted for less than 0.3% of the PCR based results.

摘要

我们展示了国际法医遗传学协会英语工作组1997年、1998年和1999年亲子鉴定研讨会的结果。参与实验室的数量分别为24个(1997年)、31个(1998年)和32个(1999年)。1997年,所有实验室都得出了正确结论,即被指控的父亲是孩子的生物学父亲。1998年,被指控的父亲是孩子的生物学兄弟,所有实验室都排除了他。1999年的案例是一个缺失案例,涉及母亲、孩子以及被指控父亲的父母,除一个实验室外,所有实验室都得出了正确结论。常规使用单基因座探针(SLP)和限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)进行可变数目串联重复序列(VNTR)检测的实验室比例从1997年的83%降至1999年的66%。在这三次研讨会上,超过90%的实验室使用基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的系统。1999年,进行PCR检测的实验室中,80%使用了市售的短串联重复序列(STR)试剂盒。其他常用系统包括通过PCR检测的HLA和PolyMarker。约20%的参与实验室常规使用传统系统以及用多基因座探针(MLP)对VNTR进行RFLP检测。在这三次研讨会上提交结果的所有实验室都使用了基于RFLP的VNTR或/和基于PCR的VNTR/STR。结果的实验室间比较显示出非常高的一致性。常用VNTR D2S44、D7S21、D7S22和D12S11的RFLP分型结果在各实验室之间的总体变异系数为1.2 - 1.3%。在绝大多数通过PCR检测的系统中都获得了一致的结果,基于PCR的结果中分型错误占比不到0.3%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验