McLean W, Boucher E A, Brennan M, Holbrook A, Orser R, Peachey J, Sellers E
Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, Ottawa, Canada.
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Winter;7(4):191-7.
To provide medical and pharmaceutical practitioners with information on the effectiveness, safety and risks associated with barbiturate-containing analgesic (BCA) agents and an approach to management of withdrawal from BCAs.
The benefits of using BCAs in the treatment of pain (compared with using non-BCAs) were weighed against potential risks. The procedures for discontinuation of BCAs in patients with pain were considered, and evidence showing that BCAs constitute a public health risk was reviewed. The evidence serving as the basis for the clinical guidelines was compiled from a number of sources, including key papers in the field, published and unpublished papers, and reports by Addiction Research Foundation researchers, a MEDLINE search from 1967 to November 1996, and communication with Canadian manufacturers of BCAs.
There is no evidence that there is a clinically important enhancement of analgesic efficacy of BCAs due to the barbiturate constituent. No epidemiological studies on the relative frequency of abuse and dependence, or studies that have analyzed combination product use from a public health and social benefit to risk perspective, have been published to clarify the issues about the nature, extent and seriousness of these problems.
No evidence exists to show a clinically important enhancement of analgesic efficacy of BCAs due to the barbiturate constituents. Because BCAs do not have a therapeutic advantage, there is no clinical reason to choose such a combination product when a simpler and often less expensive analgesic formulation (eg, acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or narcotic) or a more specific anti-migraine drug (eg, dihydroergotamine or sumatriptan) is available. BCAs should be avoided in elderly people and should not be used in children. Extrapolation from published reports on abuse and withdrawal syndrome with these drugs suggests that BCAs have the potential to produce drug dependence and addictive behaviour, especially with regular use. In BCA overdose, the barbiturate component is only one of the clinically significant contributors to any morbidity, but its presence can complicate the management of additive or synergistic toxicities. Therefore, there is no reason to choose a combination product when a simpler product may be a safer alternative by minimizing the potential for addiction and the occurrence of additive side effects or toxicities. It is further recommended that prescribers re-evaluate treatment for patients using BCAs. Recommendations for withdrawal are provided, based on estimated consumption.
为医学和药学从业者提供有关含巴比妥酸盐镇痛剂(BCA)的有效性、安全性和风险的信息,以及BCA戒断管理方法。
权衡使用BCA治疗疼痛(与使用非BCA相比)的益处与潜在风险。考虑了疼痛患者停用BCA的程序,并审查了表明BCA构成公共卫生风险的证据。作为临床指南基础的证据来自多个来源,包括该领域的关键论文、已发表和未发表的论文、成瘾研究基金会研究人员的报告、1967年至1996年11月的MEDLINE搜索,以及与加拿大BCA制造商的沟通。
没有证据表明巴比妥酸盐成分能在临床上显著增强BCA的镇痛效果。尚未发表关于滥用和依赖相对频率的流行病学研究,也没有从公共卫生和社会效益与风险角度分析复方产品使用情况的研究来阐明这些问题的性质、程度和严重性。
没有证据表明巴比妥酸盐成分能在临床上显著增强BCA的镇痛效果。由于BCA没有治疗优势,当有更简单且通常更便宜的镇痛制剂(如对乙酰氨基酚、乙酰水杨酸、非甾体抗炎药或麻醉剂)或更具特异性的抗偏头痛药物(如双氢麦角胺或舒马曲坦)可用时,没有临床理由选择此类复方产品。老年人应避免使用BCA,儿童不应使用。从已发表的关于这些药物滥用和戒断综合征的报告推断,BCA有产生药物依赖和成瘾行为的可能性,尤其是长期使用时。在BCA过量使用时,巴比妥酸盐成分只是任何发病率的临床显著促成因素之一,但其存在会使相加或协同毒性的管理复杂化。因此,当更简单的产品通过将成瘾可能性以及相加副作用或毒性的发生降至最低可能是更安全的选择时,没有理由选择复方产品。进一步建议开处方者重新评估使用BCA患者的治疗。根据估计的用药量提供了戒断建议。