Suppr超能文献

幼猪深低温循环停搏期间使用膜式氧合器对α稳态和pH稳态策略的对比分析。

Comparative analysis of alpha-stat and pH-stat strategies with a membrane oxygenator during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in young pigs.

作者信息

Kim W G, Lim C, Moon H J, Kim Y J

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Heart Research Institute, BK 21 Human Life Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Artif Organs. 2000 Nov;24(11):908-12.

Abstract

Using young pigs, this study compared the strategies of alpha-stat and pH-stat during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) for the cooling time of brains during the induction of hypothermia and rewarming time with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); the cerebral perfusion rate and metabolism rate, and the ratio of these 2 rates; and the extent of the cerebral edema development after circulatory arrest. Fourteen young pigs were assigned to 1 of 2 strategies of gas management. Cerebral blood flow was measured with a cerebral venous outflow technique. With CPB, core cooling was initiated and continued until the nasopharyngeal temperature fell below 20 degrees C. The flow rate was set at 2,500 ml/min. Once the temperature reached below 20 degrees C, the animals were subjected to DHCA for 40 min. During the cooling period, the acid-base balance was maintained using either alpha-stat or pH-stat strategy. After DHCA, the body was rewarmed to the normal body temperature. The animals then were sacrificed, and we measured the brain water content. The cerebral perfusion and metabolism rates were measured before the onset of CPB, before cooling, before DHCA, 15 min after rewarming, and upon the completion of rewarming. The cooling time was significantly shorter with alpha-stat than with pH-stat strategy while no significant differences were observed in the rewarming time between groups. Also, no significant differences were found in cerebral blood flow volume, metabolic rate, or flow/metabolic rate ratio between groups. In each group, the cerebral blood flow volume, metabolic rate, and flow/metabolic rate ratio showed significant differences in body temperature. Brain water content showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. In summary, this study found no significant differences between alpha-stat and pH-stat strategies, except in the cooling time. The cooling time was rather shorter with the alpha-stat than with the pH-stat strategy.

摘要

本研究使用幼猪,比较了在深低温循环骤停(DHCA)期间,α稳态和pH稳态策略对低温诱导过程中脑冷却时间、体外循环(CPB)复温时间的影响;脑灌注率和代谢率,以及这两个率的比值;循环骤停后脑水肿发展的程度。14只幼猪被分配到两种气体管理策略中的一种。采用脑静脉流出技术测量脑血流量。使用CPB开始并持续进行核心降温,直到鼻咽温度降至20℃以下。流速设定为2500ml/min。一旦温度降至20℃以下,动物接受40分钟的DHCA。在降温期间,使用α稳态或pH稳态策略维持酸碱平衡。DHCA后,将身体复温至正常体温。然后处死动物,测量脑含水量。在CPB开始前、降温前、DHCA前、复温15分钟后和复温完成时测量脑灌注和代谢率。α稳态策略的冷却时间明显短于pH稳态策略,而两组之间的复温时间没有显著差异。此外,两组之间的脑血流量、代谢率或流量/代谢率比值也没有显著差异。在每组中,脑血流量、代谢率和流量/代谢率比值在体温方面存在显著差异。两组之间的脑含水量没有显著差异。总之,本研究发现α稳态和pH稳态策略之间没有显著差异,除了冷却时间。α稳态策略的冷却时间比pH稳态策略更短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验