Yamaguchi Y, Crane S, Zhou L, Ochoa S M, Falanga V
Boston University School of Medicine, Roger Williams Medical Center, Department of Dermatology and Skin Surgery, 50 Maude Street, Providence, RI 02908, USA.
Br J Dermatol. 2000 Dec;143(6):1149-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03881.x.
Several extracellular matrix genes, most notably alpha1(I) and alpha1(III) procollagen, are reported to be co-ordinately expressed in cultures of dermal fibroblasts. However, it remains unclear whether the expression of these genes is truly co-ordinate or whether it may be the result of averaging the phenotypic expression of different fibroblast subpopulations present within each culture. Objectives To determine by Northern analysis the correlation between alpha1(I) and alpha1(III) procollagen mRNA levels in clonal populations of human dermal fibroblasts.
As previously described, clonal cultures were derived from parent strains of human dermal fibroblasts by a microscopically controlled dilution technique and by stimulation of single cells with low oxygen tension in the early phases of clonal growth.
In agreement with previous reports, we found that baseline steady-state levels of alpha1(I) procollagen mRNA were co-ordinately regulated with the alpha1(III) procollagen mRNA in 26 parent strains (r = 0. 9003; P < 0.0001). However, this close correlation between the expression of these two procollagen chains was absent in a total of 40 unselected clonal strains derived from four of the parent cultures (r = 0.5745; P < 0.0001). Moreover, this intrachain heterogeneity in alpha1(I) and alpha1(III) procollagen mRNA levels in clonal cultures was statistically significant from that measured in parent strains (P = 0.0016).
alpha1(I) and alpha1(III) procollagen mRNA levels in clonal cultures do not show the tight co-ordinate regulation observed in non-clonal cultures, suggesting that these two genes operate under different sets of regulatory controls. This clonal heterogeneity may provide additional flexibility to the process of tissue repair and fibroblast clonal expansion.
据报道,几种细胞外基质基因,最显著的是α1(I)和α1(III)前胶原,在真皮成纤维细胞培养物中协同表达。然而,这些基因的表达是真正协同的,还是可能是每种培养物中存在的不同成纤维细胞亚群的表型表达平均化的结果,仍不清楚。目的通过Northern分析确定人真皮成纤维细胞克隆群体中α1(I)和α1(III)前胶原mRNA水平之间的相关性。
如前所述,通过显微镜控制的稀释技术以及在克隆生长早期用低氧张力刺激单细胞,从人真皮成纤维细胞的亲本菌株中获得克隆培养物。
与先前的报道一致,我们发现26个亲本菌株中α1(I)前胶原mRNA的基线稳态水平与α1(III)前胶原mRNA协同调节(r = 0.9003;P < 0.0001)。然而,在来自四种亲本培养物的总共40个未选择的克隆菌株中,这两条前胶原链的表达之间不存在这种紧密相关性(r = 0.5745;P < 0.0001)。此外,克隆培养物中α1(I)和α1(III)前胶原mRNA水平的这种链内异质性与亲本菌株中测得的异质性在统计学上有显著差异(P = 0.0016)。
克隆培养物中α1(I)和α1(III)前胶原mRNA水平未显示出在非克隆培养物中观察到的紧密协同调节,这表明这两个基因在不同的调控控制下运作。这种克隆异质性可能为组织修复和成纤维细胞克隆扩增过程提供额外的灵活性。