Comparing apples and oranges: a randomised prospective study.
作者信息
Barone J E
机构信息
Stamford Hospital, Stamford, CT 06904, USA.
出版信息
BMJ. 2000;321(7276):1569-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7276.1569.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Comparing apples and oranges: a randomised prospective study.比较苹果和橙子：一项随机前瞻性研究。
BMJ. 2000;321(7276):1569-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7276.1569.
2
Apples and oranges have previously been shown to be remarkably similar.苹果和橙子此前已被证明非常相似。
BMJ. 2001 Apr 14;322(7291):931.
3
Why you should avoid statistics.
Biol Psychiatry. 1988 Jan 1;23(1):79-85. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(88)90107-2.
4
M.R. update: Harry F. Dietrich.
Ment Retard. 1977 Dec;15(6):35-7.
5
Wanted---more answers than questions: literature review.需求——答案多于问题：文献综述
BMJ. 2001;323(7327):1462-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7327.1462.
6
Editorial: pharmacodynamics of potassium-competitive acid blockers: comparing apples with apples-and with oranges.社论：钾竞争性酸阻滞剂的药效学：同类相比——以及异类相比。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;53(1):190-191. doi: 10.1111/apt.16140.
7
The research experience: from Agassiz to the Victoria embankment.
Community Dent Health. 1991 Jul;8(2):181-2.
8
Humor in counseling and psychotherapy: a 20-year retrospective.咨询与心理治疗中的幽默：二十年回顾
Psychol Rep. 1992 Jun;70(3 Pt 1):755-62. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.70.3.755.
9
Editorial: pharmacodynamics of potassium-competitive acid blockers: comparing apples with apples - and with oranges. Authors' reply.编者按：钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂的药效学：同类相比——及与异类相比。作者回复
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;53(1):192-193. doi: 10.1111/apt.16165.
10
Applicability of a multiresidue method and high performance liquid chromatography for determining quinomethionate in apples and oranges.
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1983 Jul;66(4):1018-22.
引用本文的文献
1
From Genome-Wide to Environment-Wide: Capturing the Environome.从全基因组到全环境：捕捉环境基因组。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):30-40. doi: 10.1177/1745691620979803. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
2
Ten simple rules for more objective decision-making.实现更客观决策的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Apr 2;16(4):e1007706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007706. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
Does improving sleep lead to better mental health? A protocol for a meta-analytic review of randomised controlled trials.改善睡眠是否会带来更好的心理健康？一项对随机对照试验进行荟萃分析综述的方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 18;7(9):e016873. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016873.
4
Who ever said size doesn't matter? The association between journal title length and impact factor.谁说篇幅不重要？期刊标题长度与影响因子之间的关联。
NDT Plus. 2008 Apr;1(2):126-127. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfm047. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
5
Vitiligo and alopecia areata: apples and oranges?白癜风和斑秃：苹果和橙子？
Exp Dermatol. 2013 Dec;22(12):785-9. doi: 10.1111/exd.12264.
6
A tale of two citations: counting on numeracy in the digital divide.两种引用方式的故事：数字鸿沟中的数字素养考量
BMJ. 2002 Dec 21;325(7378):1452-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7378.1452.
7
Apples and oranges have previously been shown to be remarkably similar.苹果和橙子此前已被证明非常相似。
BMJ. 2001 Apr 14;322(7291):931.
本文引用的文献
1
Comparing apples and oranges in the Plio-Pleistocene: methodological comments on "meat-eating by early hominids at the FLK 22 Zinjanthropus site, Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania): an experimental approach using cut-mark data".对比上新世-更新世的不同事物：对《奥杜威峡谷（坦桑尼亚）FLK 22能人遗址早期人类食肉情况：利用切割痕迹数据的实验方法》的方法学评论
J Hum Evol. 1999 Nov;37(5):789-92; discussion 793-800. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1999.0320.
2
Apples and oranges : flaws and guffaws.风马牛不相及：瑕疵与哄笑。
Chest. 1999 Oct;116(4):1137-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.4.1137.
3
Apples and oranges.风马牛不相及。
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 May;33(5):602-3.
4
Comparing apples with oranges.将苹果与橙子作比较。（意译为：风马牛不相及。）
Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(15):1591-2. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.15.1591.
5
Comparing apples to oranges.
Anesth Analg. 1995 Aug;81(2):428-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199508000-00053.
Zotero 插件