Jassim Al Khaja K A, Sequeira R P, Mathur V S
College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000 Dec;38(12):568-80. doi: 10.5414/cpp38568.
To explore the prescribing pattern and rationale of antihypertensive combination drug therapy at the level of primary health care centers; and to analyze the extent of physicians' adherence to dosage range of antihypertensives in combination regimens as recommended by Guidelines Subcommittee of WHO/ISH 1999.
SUBJECTS, MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prescribing survey of antihypertensive combination regimens among patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension was conducted in 7 out of a total of 18 health centers in Bahrain. The relevant data for our study was collected using cards designed for chronically ill patients.
A total of 2414 hypertensive patients (62.9%), of a 3838 study population, were on monotherapy, whereas 1414 (37.1%) were on antihypertensive combination therapy. Among those who were treated with drug combinations, 85.1% (n = 1212) received two-drug, 14.2% (n = 202) received three-drug and four- and five-drug regimens were used by 0.6% and 0.07%, respectively. Prescription analysis revealed that 17 different two- and three-antihypertensive drug combinations were prescribed for each category. The four major two-drug regimens were ranked in the following order: a beta-blocker with a diuretic (40.4%) used more frequently in females than in males (p < 0.0001), a beta-blocker with a calcium channel blocker (19.7%), a beta-blocker with an ACE inhibitor (12.8%) and a diuretic with an ACE inhibitor (7.3%) - used more frequently in males than in females (p = 0.001, 0.01, and 0.028, respectively). The most frequently prescribed three-drug regimens were diuretic and a beta-blocker plus either an ACE inhibitor (30.7%) or a calcium channel blocker (22.3%), beta-blocker plus an ACE inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker (16.3%), and a diuretic plus an ACE inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker (11.4%). There was no gender-related difference among triple-drug regimens. There was a trend towards using high doses of the beta-blocker atenolol, ACE inhibitors and methyldopa.
The prescribing patterns of some practising physicians were analyzed in terms of conformity with guidelines of combination of drugs and dosages. The use of antihypertensive combination therapy and the doses of individual drugs in combination regimens seem to be partly non-compliant with guidelines issued by WHO recommendations; this is illustrated by excessive prescription of some irrational combinations, as well as limited prescription of some rational combinations. In addition, a tendency to use high doses of certain classes of antihypertensive combinations was observed.
探讨基层医疗中心抗高血压联合药物治疗的处方模式及依据;分析医生对世界卫生组织/国际高血压学会1999年指南小组委员会推荐的联合治疗方案中抗高血压药物剂量范围的遵循程度。
对象、材料与方法:在巴林18个医疗中心中的7个,对无并发症原发性高血压患者的抗高血压联合治疗方案进行了处方调查。我们研究的相关数据通过为慢性病患者设计的卡片收集。
在3838名研究对象中,共有2414名高血压患者(62.9%)接受单药治疗,而1414名(37.1%)接受抗高血压联合治疗。在接受联合用药治疗的患者中,85.1%(n = 1212)接受两药联合治疗,14.2%(n = 202)接受三药联合治疗,接受四药和五药联合治疗的分别占0.6%和0.07%。处方分析显示,每类中开出了17种不同的两药和三药抗高血压药物组合。四种主要的两药联合治疗方案按以下顺序排列:β受体阻滞剂与利尿剂联合(40.4%),女性使用频率高于男性(p < 0.0001);β受体阻滞剂与钙通道阻滞剂联合(19.7%);β受体阻滞剂与ACE抑制剂联合(12.8%);利尿剂与ACE抑制剂联合(7.3%),男性使用频率高于女性(分别为p = 0.001、0.01和0.028)。最常开出的三药联合治疗方案是利尿剂与β受体阻滞剂加ACE抑制剂(30.7%)或钙通道阻滞剂(22.3%)、β受体阻滞剂加ACE抑制剂和钙通道阻滞剂(16.3%)、利尿剂加ACE抑制剂和钙通道阻滞剂(11.4%)。三药联合治疗方案中无性别差异。存在使用高剂量阿替洛尔、ACE抑制剂和甲基多巴的趋势。
根据药物联合使用及剂量的指南,分析了部分执业医生的处方模式。抗高血压联合治疗的使用以及联合治疗方案中各药物的剂量似乎部分不符合世界卫生组织建议发布的指南;一些不合理组合的过度处方以及一些合理组合的有限处方说明了这一点。此外,观察到使用某些类抗高血压联合药物高剂量的趋势。