Suppr超能文献

[Viability of colonoscopy without analgesia and conscious sedation].

作者信息

Cacho G, Dueñas C, Pérez de las Vacas J, Robledo P, Rosado J L

机构信息

Unidad de Aparato Digestivo, Fundación Hospital Alcorcón, Madrid.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 Nov;23(9):407-11.

Abstract

AIM

To study the need for analgesia and sedation before colonoscopy.

PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN

Fifty consecutive outpatients were randomly assigned to receive meperidine (0.7 mg/kg) or midazolam (0-035 mg/kg) intravenously (n = 25) or to receive no medication (n = 25) before colonoscopy. Oxygen saturation (SaO2) and heart rate were monitored. Mean blood pressure (MBP) was recorded before and after endoscopy. Patients in the group receiving no medication who experienced marked abdominal pain received sedation and analgesia similar to the premedicated group. Twenty-four hours after the procedure, the patients evaluated the degree of abdominal pain experienced during colonoscopy on a scale from 0 to 9.

RESULTS

Complete colonoscopy was performed in 92% of the patients. No significant changes in heart rate were registered in either group. However, in the premedicated group mean blood pressure fell significantly (97.6 +/- 2.6 vs. 89.5 +/- 2.7 mmHg) before and after colonoscopy, respectively (p < 0.05). Nine patients experienced clinically relevant oxygen desaturation (SaO2 > 90%). Of these, five were from the premedicated group and four were from the group receiving no medication. In two patients, both from the premedicated group, the decrease in SaO2 was severe (SaO2 < 85%). The degree of abdominal pain was similar in both groups: 3.64_0.47 (premedicated) vs. 3.92 +/- 0.5 (non-medicated). In the non-medicated group, two patients required analgesia and sedation to complete the colonoscopy and 20 (80%) preferred not to receive sedation in future colonoscopies.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonoscopy may be well tolerated without systematic administration of sedation and analgesia, which could be administered selectively.

摘要

相似文献

1
2
Combining physostigmine with meperidine for sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy.
Endoscopy. 2005 Dec;37(12):1205-10. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870217.
3
Safer colonoscopy with patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with propofol and alfentanil.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Jul;54(1):1-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.116174.
4
Remifentanil vs. meperidine for patient-controlled analgesia during colonoscopy: a randomized double-blind trial.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 May;104(5):1119-24. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.53. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
5
Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored anesthesia care?
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Jul;50(6):736-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01047.x.
6
Colonoscopy without sedation.
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2003 Mar;14(1):59-63.
9
Nurse-administered propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for upper endoscopy in cirrhotic patients.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Nov;98(11):2440-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.08668.x.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验