Suppr超能文献

临床实验室中比较心肌灌注剂的图像质量:小型测试组和大型参考人群

Comparing the image quality of myocardial perfusion agents in the clinical laboratory: small test groups and large reference populations.

作者信息

Hurwitz G A, McLaughlin D S, Slomka P J

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Nucl Med Commun. 2000 Oct;21(10):907-15. doi: 10.1097/00006231-200010000-00004.

Abstract

Myocardial perfusion studies have been performed for 6 years using technetium-99m (99Tcm)-sestamibi (MIBI). In this study we evaluated a newer agent, 99Tcm-tetrofosmin (TF), on a trial basis for 2 weeks, and compared the results from each week to those in an adjacent week of MIBI use. The routine protocol included weight-based dosing, frequent dipyridamole use, and separate-day rest and stress wherever possible. During the first week, TF was used with 'usual' image timing, i.e. stress tomography performed 30-60 min after stress, and ancillary immediate images performed 4 min after injection. For the second week, 'early' tomography was performed 15-30 min after stress. TF scans (n = 53) were compared with MIBI scans for the adjacent weeks (n = 54) and with a historical reference series (n = 1800). Blinded analysis was made of tomographic image quality, peak myocardial counts and background activity (lung and abdomen) on immediate and delayed acquisitions and on tomographic reconstructions. The TF and MIBI test groups were similar with respect to gender, weight, stress protocol, tracer doses, imaging times and scintigraphic findings. Using analysis of variance, the tomographic quality scores were similar for the two observers, with stress>rest (P<0.0001), 'usual'>'early' (P<0.001) and MIBI>TF (P<0.05). Myocardial counts were approximately 20% higher with the MIBI test group than with TF at all times after stress (P=0.001), and were similar to the reference population. MIBI with usual timing gave more favourable stress abdominal background ratios than the other three agent/timing combinations. Satisfactory images could be obtained with TF, but no apparent advantage over MIBI could be attained with earlier post-stress imaging. Subtle advantages for MIBI over TF were suggested by comparison of the small test groups. In our local imaging context, these conclusions were reinforced by a large control series.

摘要

使用锝-99m(99Tcm)-甲氧基异丁基异腈(MIBI)进行心肌灌注研究已有6年。在本研究中,我们试用了一种更新的药物99Tcm-替曲膦(TF)两周,并将每周的结果与相邻使用MIBI的周次结果进行比较。常规方案包括根据体重给药、频繁使用双嘧达莫以及尽可能在不同日期进行静息和负荷显像。在第一周,TF采用“常规”图像采集时间,即负荷断层显像在负荷后30 - 60分钟进行,辅助即时图像在注射后4分钟进行。在第二周,负荷后15 - 30分钟进行“早期”断层显像。将TF扫描(n = 53)与相邻周次的MIBI扫描(n = 54)以及历史对照系列(n = 1800)进行比较。对断层图像质量、心肌计数峰值以及即时和延迟采集及断层重建时的背景活性(肺和腹部)进行盲法分析。TF和MIBI测试组在性别、体重、负荷方案、示踪剂剂量、成像时间和闪烁显像结果方面相似。使用方差分析,两位观察者的断层图像质量评分相似,负荷显像>静息显像(P<0.0001),“常规”>“早期”(P<0.001),MIBI>TF(P<0.05)。负荷后所有时间,MIBI测试组的心肌计数比TF高约20%(P = 0.001),且与对照人群相似。常规采集时间的MIBI比其他三种药物/采集时间组合的负荷腹部背景比值更有利。TF能获得满意的图像,但负荷后早期成像相比MIBI并无明显优势。小测试组的比较提示MIBI比TF有细微优势。在我们当地的成像环境中,大量对照系列强化了这些结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验