Boström J, Gundertofte K, Liljeforsa T
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Royal Danish School of Pharmacy, Universitetsparken 2, Copenhagen., Denmark
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2000 Nov;14(8):769-86. doi: 10.1023/a:1008198026843.
A pharmacophore model for dopamine D4 antagonists has been developed on the basis of a previously reported dopamine D2 model. By using exhaustive conformational analyses (MM3* force field and the GB/SA hydration model) and least-squares molecular superimposition studies, a set of eighteen structurally diverse high affinity D4 antagonists have successfully been accommodated in the D4 pharmacophore model. Enantioselectivities may be rationalized by conformational energies required for the enantiomers to adopt their proposed bioactive conformations. The pharmacophore models for antagonists at the D4 and D2 receptor subtypes have been compared in order to get insight into molecular properties of importance for D2/D4 receptor selectivity. It is concluded that the bioactive conformations of antagonists at the two receptor subtypes are essentially identical. Receptor essential volumes previously identified for the D2 receptor are shown to be present also in the D4 receptor. In addition, a novel receptor essential volume in the D4 receptor, not present in the D2 receptor, has been identified. This feature may be exploited for the design of D4 selective antagonists. However, it is concluded that the major determinant for D2/D4 selectivity is the nature of the interactions between the receptor and aromatic ring systems. The effects of the electronic properties of these ring systems on the affinities for the two receptor subtypes differ substantially.
基于先前报道的多巴胺D2模型,已开发出多巴胺D4拮抗剂的药效团模型。通过使用详尽的构象分析(MM3*力场和GB/SA水合模型)以及最小二乘分子叠合研究,一组18种结构各异的高亲和力D4拮抗剂已成功纳入D4药效团模型。对映选择性可以通过对映体采用其假定的生物活性构象所需的构象能量来解释。已比较了D4和D2受体亚型拮抗剂的药效团模型,以便深入了解对D2/D4受体选择性重要的分子特性。得出的结论是,两种受体亚型拮抗剂的生物活性构象基本相同。先前为D2受体确定的受体必需体积在D4受体中也存在。此外,已在D4受体中鉴定出一种D2受体中不存在的新型受体必需体积。这一特征可用于设计D4选择性拮抗剂。然而,得出的结论是,D2/D4选择性的主要决定因素是受体与芳环系统之间相互作用的性质。这些环系统的电子性质对两种受体亚型亲和力的影响有很大差异。