Coopmans V C, Gries C A
Medical College of Virginia Hospitals, Richmond, Va., USA.
AANA J. 2000 Jun;68(3):247-56.
Despite 2 decades of experience with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, some controversy regarding their use still remains. By using a mailed questionnaire to a randomized sample of 500 active members of the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists, the present study explored the awareness, experiences, and opinions of nurse anesthetists regarding DNR orders for patients undergoing surgery. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the need for further education and discussion in this area. Of the 228 (45.6%) respondents, more than half had DNR policies at their facility, while the remainder reported no policy or were unsure whether a policy existed. Of those having policies, 67.2% indicated a policy of routine DNR suspension, approximately 20% had a policy of reevaluation, and the remainder were unsure of the type of policy. However, when asked what type of policy respondents thought was most appropriate, 54.2% favored a policy of reviewing the DNR order, with 95% advocating patient involvement in the reevaluation. Moreover, almost 90% of responding CRNAs indicated they would discuss DNR status with the patient before surgery. When a patient with a DNR order subsequently had an intraoperative cardiac event, 13% initiated resuscitation. Responding to a hypothetical question involving a patient with a DNR order, 42% to 48% of respondents indicated they would initiate resuscitative measures in such a situation depending on the cause of arrest.
尽管在“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱方面已有20年的经验,但关于其使用仍存在一些争议。通过向美国麻醉护士协会500名在职成员的随机样本邮寄调查问卷,本研究探讨了麻醉护士对接受手术患者的DNR医嘱的认知、经历和看法。该研究的目的是评估在这一领域进行进一步教育和讨论的必要性。在228名(45.6%)受访者中,超过一半的人所在机构有DNR政策,而其余的人表示没有政策或不确定是否存在相关政策。在有政策的人中,67.2%表示有常规暂停DNR的政策,约20%有重新评估的政策,其余的人不确定政策类型。然而,当被问及受访者认为哪种政策最合适时,54.2%的人赞成审查DNR医嘱的政策,95%的人主张患者参与重新评估。此外,近90%的受访认证注册麻醉护士表示,他们会在手术前与患者讨论DNR状态。当一名有DNR医嘱的患者随后在术中发生心脏事件时,13%的人进行了复苏。在回答一个涉及有DNR医嘱患者的假设问题时,42%至48%的受访者表示,在这种情况下,他们会根据心脏骤停的原因采取复苏措施。