De Gendt C, Bilsen J, Vander Stichele R, Lambert M, Van Den Noortgate N, Deliens L
Onderzoeksgroep Zorg rond het Levenseinde, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, België.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2007 Oct;38(5):246-54.
This study describes the historical development and status of a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) policy on acute geriatric wards in Flanders, Belgium. In 2002 (the year Belgium voted a law on euthanasia), a structured mail questionnaire was sent to all head geriatricians of acute geriatric wards in Flanders (N=94). Respondents were asked about the existence, development, and implementation of the DNR policy (guidelines and order forms). The response was 76.6%. Development of DNR policy began in 1985, with a step-up in 1997 and 200l. In 2002, a DNR policy was available in 86.1% of geriatric wards, predominantly with institutional DNR guidelines and individual, patient-specific DNR order forms. The policy was initiated and developed predominantly from an institutional perspective by the hospital. The forms were not standardized and generally lacked room to document patient involvement in the decision making process. Implementation of institutional DNR guidelines and individual DNR order forms on geriatric wards in Flanders lagged behind that of other countries and was still incomplete in 2002. DNR policies varied in content and scope and were predominantly an expression of institutional defensive attitudes rather than a tool to promote patient involvement in DNR and other end-of-life decisions.
本研究描述了比利时弗拉芒地区急性老年病房不进行心肺复苏(DNR)政策的历史发展及现状。2002年(比利时通过安乐死法律的年份),向弗拉芒地区所有急性老年病房的老年科主任发送了一份结构化邮件调查问卷(N = 94)。调查对象被问及DNR政策(指南和医嘱单)的存在、发展及实施情况。回复率为76.6%。DNR政策的制定始于1985年,1997年和2001年有所推进。2002年,86.1%的老年病房有DNR政策,主要是机构性的DNR指南和针对个体患者的DNR医嘱单。该政策主要由医院从机构角度发起和制定。这些表单未标准化,普遍缺乏记录患者参与决策过程的空间。弗拉芒地区老年病房机构性DNR指南和个体DNR医嘱单的实施落后于其他国家,在2002年仍不完整。DNR政策在内容和范围上各不相同,主要体现了机构的防御态度,而非促进患者参与DNR及其他临终决策的工具。