Pagani M, Malliani A
CNR Centro Ricerche Cardiovascolari, Istituto Scienze Biomediche, University of Milan, Italy.
J Hypertens. 2000 Dec;18(12):1709-19. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200018120-00002.
Computer analysis of spontaneous cardiovascular beat-by-beat variability has gained wide credibility as a means of inferring disturbances of autonomic cardiovascular regulation in a variety of cardiovascular conditions, including hypertension, myocardial infarction and heart failure. Recent applications of spectral analysis to muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) offer a new approach to a better understanding of the relationship between cardiovascular oscillations and autonomic regulation. However, areas of uncertainty and unresolved debates remain, mostly concerning different methodologies and interpretative models that we will consider in this article. Perusal of all available literature suggests that average sympathetic nerve activity and its oscillatory components, although correlated to some extent, are likely to provide different types of information. In addition, the specific experimental context is of paramount importance, as the rules that seem to govern the relationship between average and oscillatory properties of MSNA appear to be different in usual conditions and in conditions of extremes of activation or disease. In general, dynamic experiments, such as with graded tilt or with vasoactive drugs, are more suited to investigations of the complexity of autonomic regulation than are static comparisons. In addition, because the information is spread across variables and is affected by a potentially large error, it appears that several different techniques should be perceived as complementary rather than as mutually exclusive. Available evidence suggests that low-frequency and high-frequency oscillations in peripheral signals of variability might have a predominantly central, rather than a peripheral, origin and that this applies in particular to low-frequency oscillations. A crucial point in the assessment of the meaning of spectral components relates to consideration of the varying level of very-low-frequency noise, and the mathematical manipulation of derived indices, particularly using a normalization procedure. This appears easier to obtain with auto-regressive than with fast Fourier techniques. With this approach, discrepant interpretations seem to be resolved, provided adequate care is taken in separating direct physiological data from derived meaning, which relates to hidden information and neural codes; in the case of sympathetic discharge, the latter display greater complexity than simple average spike activity per unit time. Accordingly we believe, in conclusion, that the judicious use of spectral methodology, in addition to other techniques, might provide unprecedented, useful insights into autonomic cardiovascular regulation, in both physiopathological and clinical circumstances.
作为推断包括高血压、心肌梗死和心力衰竭在内的各种心血管疾病中自主神经心血管调节紊乱的一种手段,对自发性心血管逐搏变异性的计算机分析已获得广泛认可。光谱分析最近在肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)中的应用为更好地理解心血管振荡与自主神经调节之间的关系提供了一种新方法。然而,仍存在不确定性和未解决的争议领域,主要涉及我们将在本文中讨论的不同方法和解释模型。查阅所有现有文献表明,平均交感神经活动及其振荡成分虽然在一定程度上相关,但可能提供不同类型的信息。此外,特定的实验背景至关重要,因为在正常条件以及激活或疾病极端情况下,似乎支配MSNA平均特性与振荡特性之间关系的规则有所不同。一般来说,动态实验,如分级倾斜或使用血管活性药物的实验,比静态比较更适合研究自主神经调节的复杂性。此外,由于信息分布在多个变量中且受潜在的大误差影响,似乎几种不同的技术应被视为互补而非相互排斥。现有证据表明,外周变异性信号中的低频和高频振荡可能主要起源于中枢而非外周,尤其适用于低频振荡。评估光谱成分意义的一个关键点涉及对极低频率噪声变化水平的考虑,以及对派生指数的数学处理,特别是使用归一化程序。与快速傅里叶技术相比,自回归方法似乎更容易实现这一点。通过这种方法,只要在将直接生理数据与派生意义(与隐藏信息和神经编码相关)分离时足够谨慎,不一致的解释似乎就能得到解决;就交感神经放电而言,后者比单位时间内简单的平均脉冲活动显示出更大的复杂性。因此,我们最后认为,除其他技术外,明智地使用光谱方法可能会在生理病理和临床情况下为自主神经心血管调节提供前所未有的、有用的见解。