Ruggenenti P, Pagano E, Tammuzzo L, Benini R, Garattini L, Remuzzi G
Clinical Research Center for Rare Diseases "Aldo e Cele Daccò" and Center for Health Economics (CESAV), Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, and Unit of Nephrology, Ospedali Riuniti, Azienda Ospedaliera, Bergamo, Italy.
Kidney Int. 2001 Jan;59(1):286-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00490.x.
Our objectives were to predict the long-term cost and efficacy of the angiotensin-converting enzyme, ramipril, in patients with nondiabetic chronic nephropathies.
The time to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was predicted by two different models based on the rate of glomerular filtration rate decline (DeltaGFR) and incidence of ESRD (events) measured during the Ramipril Efficacy in Nephropathy Trial in 117 and 166 patients, respectively, randomized to comparable blood pressure control with ramipril or conventional therapy. Direct medical costs of conservative and renal replacement therapy were estimated by a payer perspective, and cases more and less favorable to ramipril were computed by a sensitivity analysis. The study took place at the Clinical Research Center for Rare Diseases, "Aldo & Cele Daccò," Bergamo, Italy. Patients included those with chronic, nondiabetic nephropathies and persistent urinary protein excretion rate >/=3 g/24 h. Time to ESRD, survival, and direct costs of conservative and renal replacement therapy are discussed.
Both in the DeltaGFR-based or events-based models, ramipril delayed progression to ESRD and prolonged patient survival by 1.5 to 2.2 and 1.2 to 1.4 years, respectively, and saved $16,605 to $23,894 lifetime and $2, 422 to $4203 yearly direct costs per patient. Even in the less favorable hypotheses, ramipril allowed lifetime and yearly cost savings that exceeded 10 to 11 and 20 to 40 times, respectively, the additional costs related to prolonged survival.
In our study population, ramipril prolongs life while saving money because of its beneficial effect on the course of nondiabetic chronic nephropathies.
我们的目标是预测血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂雷米普利对非糖尿病性慢性肾病患者的长期成本和疗效。
在肾病雷米普利疗效试验中,分别对117例和166例患者,根据肾小球滤过率下降率(DeltaGFR)和终末期肾病(ESRD)发生率(事件),采用两种不同模型预测终末期肾病发生时间。这些患者被随机分为雷米普利组或传统治疗组,两组血压控制情况相当。从支付方角度估算保守治疗和肾脏替代治疗的直接医疗成本,并通过敏感性分析计算对雷米普利更有利和更不利的病例。该研究在意大利贝加莫的“阿尔多与塞莱·达科”罕见病临床研究中心进行。患者包括患有慢性非糖尿病性肾病且持续尿蛋白排泄率≥3g/24小时的患者。讨论了终末期肾病发生时间、生存率以及保守治疗和肾脏替代治疗的直接成本。
在基于DeltaGFR的模型和基于事件的模型中,雷米普利均延缓了向终末期肾病的进展,分别使患者生存期延长1.5至2.2年和1.2至1.4年,每位患者终身节省直接成本16,605至23,894美元,每年节省2,422至4,203美元。即使在较不利的假设下,雷米普利节省的终身成本和年度成本分别超过因生存期延长产生的额外成本的10至11倍和20至40倍。
在我们的研究人群中,雷米普利因其对非糖尿病性慢性肾病病程的有益作用,在延长生命的同时节省了费用。