Schuller D E, Birck H G
Laryngoscope. 1975 Jan;85(1):33-46. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197501000-00003.
A series of 815 infectious croup (i.e., laryngotracheobronchitis) cases and 55 epiglottitis cases, encompassing an eight-year interval, is reviewed to determine the incidence of adverse effects of nasotracheal intubation used to manage upper airway obstruction. The racial, sex, and age distributions, in addition to modalities of treatment, are presented. The intubated cases (86 patients), representing 6.5 percent of all croup cases and 60 percent of all epiglottitis cases, are described in more detail with respect to presenting symptoms and physical findings. The average duration of intubation is 55 hours for epiglottis and 88 hours for croup. The incidence of immediate, reversible complications for the entire intubated series is 7 percent. The incidence of delayed, irreversible complications, as determined by: 1. noting any persistent post-extubation symptoms; 2. measuring peak expiratory flow rates; and 3. laryngeal polytomography, is 1.6 percent. The mortality secondary to intubation is 0 percent. The complication rate (1.6 percent) in this series of nasotracheal intubations is lower than the mortality (3.6 percent) in a large collective series of pediatric tracheotomies performed for airway obstruction in croup or epiglottitis. Other advantages of intubation vs. tracheotomy are described (i.e., shorter hospital stay, dilatatory effect of endotracheal tube). The authors conclude that nasotracheal intubation is safer than pediatric tracheotomy and should be considered the procedure of choice in the management of upper airway obstruction secondary to croup or epiglottitis.
回顾了一系列815例感染性喉炎(即喉气管支气管炎)病例和55例会厌炎病例,时间跨度为八年,以确定用于处理上气道梗阻的鼻气管插管的不良反应发生率。还呈现了种族、性别和年龄分布以及治疗方式。对插管病例(86例患者)进行了更详细的描述,这些病例占所有喉炎病例的6.5%,占所有会厌炎病例的60%,涉及呈现的症状和体格检查结果。会厌炎患者的平均插管时间为55小时,喉炎患者为88小时。整个插管系列中即刻、可逆并发症的发生率为7%。通过以下方式确定的延迟、不可逆并发症的发生率为1.6%:1. 记录拔管后任何持续症状;2. 测量呼气峰值流速;3. 喉部断层扫描。插管导致的死亡率为0%。该系列鼻气管插管的并发症发生率(1.6%)低于因喉炎或会厌炎气道梗阻而进行的大量小儿气管切开术的死亡率(3.6%)。还描述了插管相对于气管切开术的其他优点(即住院时间较短、气管内导管的扩张作用)。作者得出结论,鼻气管插管比小儿气管切开术更安全,应被视为处理喉炎或会厌炎所致上气道梗阻的首选方法。