Ostler K, Thompson C, Kinmonth A L, Peveler R C, Stevens L, Stevens A
Community Based Clinical Sciences Research Division, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Biological Sciences, University of Southampton.
Br J Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;178(1):12-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.178.1.12.
Health inequalities exist for many disorders, but the contribution of deprivation to the prevalence and outcome of depressive symptoms in primary care populations has been infrequently studied.
To examine the influence of Jarman under-privileged area (UPA) scores on the prevalence and outcome of depressive symptoms in general practice patients.
18 414 patients attending 55 representative practices completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and a questionnaire for employment status. Outcome of those screening positive was assessed at 6 weeks and 6 months.
The UPA score accounted for 48.3% of the variance between practices in prevalence of depressive symptoms. Attending a high UPA score practice predicted persistence of depressive symptoms to 6 months.
The socio-economic deprivation of a practice locality is a powerful predictor of the prevalence and persistence of depressive symptoms.
许多疾病都存在健康不平等现象,但在初级保健人群中,贫困对抑郁症状的患病率和转归的影响鲜少得到研究。
探讨贾曼贫困地区(UPA)得分对全科医疗患者抑郁症状患病率和转归的影响。
来自55家代表性诊所的18414名患者完成了医院焦虑抑郁量表及就业状况问卷。对筛查呈阳性者在6周和6个月时评估其转归。
UPA得分占各诊所间抑郁症状患病率差异的48.3%。就诊于UPA得分高的诊所预示着抑郁症状持续至6个月。
诊所所在地区的社会经济贫困是抑郁症状患病率和持续性的有力预测因素。