Suppr超能文献

熊去氧胆酸单独或与鹅去氧胆酸联合用于溶解胆固醇结石:一项随机多中心试验。英意胆结石研究组

Ursodeoxycholic acid alone or with chenodeoxycholic acid for dissolution of cholesterol gallstones: a randomized multicentre trial. The British-Italian Gallstone Study group.

作者信息

Petroni M L, Jazrawi R P, Pazzi P, Lanzini A, Zuin M, Pigozzi M G, Fracchia M, Galatola G, Alvisi V, Heaton K W, Podda M, Northfield T C

机构信息

St. George's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Jan;15(1):123-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00853.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy using ursodeoxycholic acid plus chenodeoxycholic acid has been advocated for dissolution of cholesterol gallstones because the two bile acids have complementary effects on biliary lipid metabolism and cholesterol solubilization.

AIM

To compare the clinical efficacy of combination therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid monotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 154 symptomatic patients with radiolucent stones (< or = 15 mm) in functioning gallbladders were enrolled from six centres in England and Italy. They were randomized to either a combination of chenodeoxycholic acid plus ursodeoxycholic acid (5 mg.day/kg each) or to ursodeoxycholic acid alone (10 mg.day/kg). Dissolution was assessed by 6-monthly oral cholecystography and ultrasonography for up to 24 months.

RESULTS

Both regimens reduced the frequency of biliary pain and there was no significant difference between them in terms of side-effects or dropout rate. Complete gallstone dissolution on an intention-to-treat basis was similar at all time intervals. At 24 months this was 28% with ursodeoxycholic acid alone and 30% with combination therapy. The mean dissolution rates at 6 and 12 months were 47% and 59% with ursodeoxycholic acid, and 44% and 59% with combination therapy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is no substantial difference in the efficacy of combined ursodeoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid and that of ursodeoxycholic acid alone in terms of gallstone dissolution rate, complete gallstone dissolution, or relief of biliary pain.

摘要

背景

熊去氧胆酸联合鹅去氧胆酸的联合疗法已被提倡用于溶解胆固醇结石,因为这两种胆汁酸在胆汁脂质代谢和胆固醇溶解方面具有互补作用。

目的

比较联合疗法与熊去氧胆酸单一疗法的临床疗效。

患者与方法

从英国和意大利的六个中心招募了总共154例有症状且胆囊功能正常、结石为透光性(≤15毫米)的患者。他们被随机分为鹅去氧胆酸加熊去氧胆酸联合组(各5毫克·天/千克)或单独使用熊去氧胆酸组(10毫克·天/千克)。通过每6个月进行口服胆囊造影和超声检查评估结石溶解情况,最长持续24个月。

结果

两种治疗方案均降低了胆绞痛的发作频率,在副作用或脱落率方面两者无显著差异。在意向性分析基础上,各时间点的完全结石溶解率相似。24个月时,单独使用熊去氧胆酸的完全结石溶解率为28%,联合疗法为30%。单独使用熊去氧胆酸在6个月和12个月时的平均溶解率分别为47%和59%,联合疗法分别为44%和59%。

结论

熊去氧胆酸与鹅去氧胆酸联合使用和单独使用熊去氧胆酸在结石溶解率、完全结石溶解或缓解胆绞痛方面的疗效无实质性差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验